Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The Muskingum scheme is one of the most popular and widely used methods in flood routing

The Muskingum scheme is one of the most popular and widely used methods in flood routing bQeWl
The Muskingum scheme is one of the most popular and widely used methods in flood routing. The usual procedure in using this model is to optimize the parameters that represent physical characteristic of river. These parameters are gained from the upstream and downstream historical data and used to estimate the downstream hydrograph without any updating kernel. Improved method which is coupled with updating kernel like transfer function method needs upstream hydrograph (as Muskingum input) to predict downstream hydrograph while upstream flood data is not available at same time. Predicting the upstream hydrograph as the model input in the prediction period, causes the difference between the structure of this hydrograph and the upstream hydrograph in the calibration period. as a result, the optimized parameters in the calibration period do not provide proper performance in the prediction period. In this research, instead of using the observed upstream hydrograph in the calibration period, the predicted upstream hydrograph in the calibration period is used to optimize the parameters. In the light of this, parameters obtained via genetic algorithm provide better performance for predicting downstream hydrographs. This process lead to unify the structure of the upstream hydrographs in the calibration and forecast period. Also in this paper, constant parameter Muskingum stage (CPMS method) is presented and the performance of combining CPMS with transfer function method has been investigated and compared with the results obtained by combining Saint-Venant equation with transfer function method. The mentioned structural modifications show the improvement of downstream flood prediction which is applied by Muskingum model.
The
Muskingum
scheme is one of the most popular and
widely
used
methods
in flood routing. The usual procedure in using this model is to optimize the
parameters
that represent physical characteristic of river. These
parameters
are gained
from the
upstream
and
downstream
historical data and
used
to estimate the
downstream
hydrograph
without any updating kernel.
Improved
method
which
is coupled
with updating kernel like transfer function
method
needs
upstream
hydrograph
(as
Muskingum
input) to predict
downstream
hydrograph
while
upstream
flood data is not available at same time. Predicting the
upstream
hydrograph
as the model input in the prediction
period
, causes the difference between the structure of this
hydrograph
and the
upstream
hydrograph
in the
calibration
period
.
as
a result, the optimized
parameters
in the
calibration
period
do not provide proper performance in the prediction
period
. In this research,
instead
of using the observed
upstream
hydrograph
in the
calibration
period
, the predicted
upstream
hydrograph
in the
calibration
period
is
used
to optimize the
parameters
. In the light of this,
parameters
obtained via genetic algorithm provide better performance for predicting
downstream
hydrographs
. This process lead to unify the structure of the
upstream
hydrographs
in the
calibration
and forecast
period
.
Also
in this paper, constant
parameter
Muskingum
stage (
CPMS
method)
is presented
and the performance of combining
CPMS
with transfer function
method
has
been investigated
and compared with the results obtained by combining
Saint-Venant
equation with transfer function
method
. The mentioned structural modifications
show
the improvement of
downstream
flood prediction which
is applied
by
Muskingum
model.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The Muskingum scheme is one of the most popular and widely used methods in flood routing

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
254 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: