These days there a lot of moving in our world and from that moving to cities from countryside. So, some people think that is good especially who moves to city. While other believe that will cause bigger poplation in cities and more enviroment problems. I will discuss the both sides in this essay and draw my personal concluion.
In one hand, they say that they will have better public services like hospitals, schools, universities, etc. And this have a true side because the public services usually be weaker at the countryside than city. For example, I visit the countryside in Morocco and I do not see any university near there. That make university students move to city in order to keep thier budget for longer time. So that why some think that is good to move to city.
On the other hand, some say that will make cities bigger and bigger, so this have an awful effect on destroyed the farming sector, forsts and farms. To illustrate, remove farms and build, instead of it, some apartments or houses because the city gets bigger and bigger that will have an effect on air pollution and climate change will be faster because we remove one of the Earth's lugs. Hence the belief that we should not allow to movement to city.
In addition, we may have a lake of workers in countryside and then will have a lake in farming products and maybe then we will have to import this products. To an instance, if there no workers in countryside that mean no people work there and no farming products like vegtables, fruits, milk, etc. And another problems more people does not work in city and that have an tragitic effect on economy. This clearly proves that we can not take that easy.
After a careful analysis of both point views, I believe we can not let all prople in countryside to move to city. But we can improve public services in countryside to solve this problem and stop that panic movement. 
These days there  
a lot of
 moving in our world and from that moving to  
cities
 from  
countryside
.  
So
,  
some
  people
  think
  that is
  good
  especially
 who  
moves
 to city. While other believe that will cause  
bigger
  poplation
 in  
cities
 and more  
enviroment
 problems. I will discuss the both sides in this essay and draw my personal  
concluion
.
In one hand, they say that they will have better public services like hospitals, schools, universities, etc. And  
this have
 a true side  
because
 the public services  
usually
 be weaker at the  
countryside
 than city.  
For example
, I visit the  
countryside
 in Morocco and I do not  
see
 any university near there. That  
make
 university students  
move
 to city in order to  
keep
  thier
 budget for longer time.  
So
 that why  
some
  think
  that is
  good
 to  
move
 to city. 
On the other hand
,  
some
 say that will  
make
  cities
  bigger
 and  
bigger
,  
so
  this have
 an awful effect on  
destroyed
 the farming sector,  
forsts
 and farms. To illustrate, remove farms and build,  
instead
 of it,  
some
 apartments or  
houses
  because
 the city  
gets
  bigger
 and  
bigger
 that will have an effect on air pollution and climate  
change
 will be faster  
because
 we remove one of the Earth's lugs.  
Hence
 the belief that we should not  
allow
 to movement to city. 
In addition
, we may have a lake of workers in  
countryside
 and then will have a lake in farming products and maybe then we will  
have to
 import  
this
 products. To an instance, if  
there no
 workers in  
countryside
 that mean no  
people
 work there and no farming products like  
vegtables
, fruits, milk, etc. And another problems more  
people
  does
 not work in city and that have  
an
  tragitic
 effect on economy. This  
clearly
 proves that we can not take that easy.
After a careful analysis of both point views, I believe we can not  
let
 all  
prople
 in  
countryside
 to  
move
 to city.  
But
 we can  
improve
 public services in  
countryside
 to solve this problem and  
stop
 that panic movement.