The manufactured edible products containing high levels of sugar can cause a number of health complications. To restrict people from consuming more such sugary products, they must be made more costly. In my opinion, this may not be a pragmatic approach. To support my view, let's discuss few points in detail.
Firstly, checking in history, it is evident that people find some or other way to get the food of interest. Since, sweet food is a major part of todays diet, it is impossible to remove such component for one's food. For example, let's consider alcohol and tabaco which are injuries to health. Many governments tried to control it by hiking the rates. As a result, demand for such items in black market has peaked. Similarly, increasing prices will lead to a lot of demand black market which is further more difficult to control.
Second, most of food and drink companies contribute a significant role in countries economy. Increasing the value of such goods may disturb the market, leading to instability and chaos. For example, let's say if the prices of products of companies like cocola which play a key player in soft drink industry across many countries are doubled. This change in price will effect the revenue of the companies and in turn the government's income. Such acts may lead to economic depression as these organizations are key industries in some countries.
Adding up, there are many other forms of sugar which are less harmful to health. Incorporating such innovations may help solve this problem just by replacing the harmful sweetening agents with better substances. For example, there are many sweeting products available in the market that replace sugar in tea and home cooked food for diabetic patients. Usage of such items can easily solve this issue.
To conclude, surge in price of these commodities may not be the optimal way to restrict the public from consuming the sugary products. Therefore, is best if more innovative practices are involved in manufacturing such foods is better than making harsh judgements such as price hiking.
The manufactured edible
products
containing high levels of sugar can cause a number of health complications. To restrict
people
from consuming more such sugary
products
, they
must
be made
more costly. In my opinion, this may not be a pragmatic approach. To support my view,
let
's discuss few points in detail.
Firstly
, checking in history, it is evident that
people
find
some
or other way to
get
the
food
of interest. Since, sweet
food
is a major part of
todays
diet, it is impossible to remove such component for one's
food
.
For example
,
let
's consider alcohol and
tabaco
which are injuries to health.
Many
governments
tried to control it by hiking the rates.
As a result
, demand for such items in black
market
has peaked.
Similarly
, increasing
prices
will lead to
a lot of
demand black
market
which is
further
more difficult to control.
Second, most of
food
and drink
companies
contribute a significant role in countries economy. Increasing the value of such
goods
may disturb the
market
, leading to instability and chaos.
For example
,
let
's say if the
prices
of
products
of
companies
like
cocola
which play a key player in soft drink industry across
many
countries
are doubled
. This
change
in
price
will
effect
the revenue of the
companies
and in turn the
government
's income. Such acts may lead to economic depression as these organizations are key industries in
some
countries.
Adding up, there are
many
other forms of sugar which are less harmful to health. Incorporating such innovations may
help
solve this problem
just
by replacing the harmful sweetening agents with better substances.
For example
, there are
many
sweeting
products
available in the
market
that replace sugar in tea and home cooked
food
for diabetic patients. Usage of such items can
easily
solve this issue.
To conclude
, surge in
price
of these commodities may not be the optimal way to restrict the public from consuming the sugary
products
.
Therefore
,
is best
if more innovative practices
are involved
in manufacturing such
foods
is better than making harsh judgements such as
price
hiking.