The main reason of poor education quality among children nowadays is that they spend a lot of their time watching television programmes and do things that are remotely connected to quality education. I completely agree with the statement that television cannot replace the book as a learning tool as it is far less educative and far more addictive.
Firstly, television cannot replace books as learning materials owing to the fact that children often misuse television in the disappearance of parents. For instance, educative programs are less attractive than the cartoon shows and other programs children prefer to watch. While there are lots of educative and suitable programs, it is not unusual that a child would prefer to watch programs that entertain more than educating.
Another reason television is not as suitable as a book because when children learn through television then their focus will be on audio-visual presentation, not in learning. Whereas if they follow books then they focus on books and the lessons it offers.
It is often heard that many children watch TV for long hours and that is detrimental to their health. Television programs are addictive and many children do not concentrate on other important things like study or outdoor activity when they become addicted to watching TV programs.
Finally, television cannot replace the book as learning tool due to television might be a tool that would be wastage of time. However, if children spend more time in reading books there is no chance of wastage of time. The primary focus of television is entertaining people while books are considered as the cornerstone of knowledge and wisdom.
To conclusion, although television is more entertaining than books, it cannot become a great tool for education as books are for children. The book is still the most appropriate learning tool and the television can never replace it terms of child’s education.
The main reason of poor
education
quality among
children
nowadays is that they spend
a lot of
their
time
watching
television
programmes
and do things that are
remotely
connected to quality
education
. I completely
agree
with the statement that
television
cannot
replace
the
book
as a
learning
tool
as it is far less educative and far more addictive.
Firstly
,
television
cannot
replace
books
as
learning
materials owing to the fact that
children
often
misuse
television
in the disappearance of parents.
For instance
, educative
programs
are less attractive than the cartoon
shows
and other
programs
children
prefer to
watch
. While there are lots of educative and suitable
programs
, it is not unusual that a child would prefer to
watch
programs
that entertain more than educating.
Another reason
television
is not as suitable as a
book
because
when
children
learn through
television
then their focus will be on audio-visual presentation, not in
learning
. Whereas if they follow
books
then they focus on
books
and the lessons it offers.
It is
often
heard that
many
children
watch
TV for long hours and
that is
detrimental to their health.
Television
programs
are addictive and
many
children
do not concentrate on other
important
things like study or outdoor activity when they become addicted to watching TV programs.
Finally
,
television
cannot
replace
the
book
as
learning
tool
due to
television
might be a
tool
that would be wastage of
time
.
However
, if
children
spend more
time
in reading
books
there is no chance of wastage of
time
. The primary focus of
television
is entertaining
people
while
books
are considered
as the cornerstone of knowledge and wisdom.
To conclusion, although
television
is more entertaining than
books
, it cannot become a great
tool
for
education
as
books
are for
children
. The
book
is
still
the most appropriate
learning
tool
and the
television
can never
replace
it terms of child’s
education
.