Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The Increase of Sea Levels

The Increase of Sea Levels QwM5b
The reading passage and the lecturer both concentrated on a problem that has been around for the last decades. The passage proposes 3 main theories regarding the normality of the increase of the sea level. Nevertheless, the claims made In the article are repudiated by the lecturer as her viewpoint is that it is definitely not natural and it is a result of human actions. First and foremost, referring to the reading passage, the increase is gradual and slow, and the passage addresses that by looking and analyzing data, it is proven that there is nothing to worry about as it is a normal thing that had happened before. However, the lecturer asserts that the rise of sea levels is rapid and fast. The lecturer emphasizes the notion that we must worry because if humanity did not act quickly the future will suffer. A second addition, the writer further mentions that the rise in the polar of ice is clearly not the cause of the increase. Due to the fact that the ice is already inside the water. She portrayed what she means by explaining how if ice cubes melted in a cup of water, it would never spill. It is declared in the article that the reason behind the rise of sea levels is still mysterious to scientists. She mentions that NASA has stated that they are still unaware of the cause. The lecturer, on the other hand, claims that human activity is the main reason that resulted in impacting sea levels. She illustrated what she means by elaborating that ice melting on land is the main cause resulted from another factor. She subsequently continues to state that burning fossil fuel is the most effecting factor. Lastly, the author posits that the same thing as what happened previously would happen again. According to the article’s writer, there is enough time to adjust. In contrast, the lecturer’s stance is that adjusting is not possible. She makes the statement that our economy is based everywhere including around water sources. Therefore, it would affect the country’s economic status as the landmass will decrease by approximately 20%. To sum up, the lecturer and the article’s author have distinct perspectives. The article’s writer believes that the increase in sea levels is not that big of a deal. On the contrary, the lecturer supposes that it is not as normal as some might argue.
The reading
passage
and the
lecturer
both concentrated on a problem that has been around for the last decades. The
passage
proposes 3 main theories regarding the normality of the
increase
of the
sea
level
.
Nevertheless
, the claims made In the
article
are repudiated
by the
lecturer
as her viewpoint is that it is definitely not natural and it is a result of human actions.

First
and foremost, referring to the reading
passage
, the
increase
is gradual and slow, and the
passage
addresses that by looking and analyzing data, it
is proven
that there is nothing to worry about as it is a normal thing that had happened
before
.
However
, the
lecturer
asserts that the rise of
sea
levels
is rapid and
fast
. The
lecturer
emphasizes the notion that we
must
worry
because
if humanity did not act
quickly
the future will suffer.

A second addition, the writer
further
mentions that the rise in the polar of ice is
clearly
not the cause of the
increase
. Due to the fact that the ice is already inside the water. She portrayed what she means by explaining how if ice cubes melted in a cup of water, it would never spill. It
is declared
in the
article
that the reason behind the rise of
sea
levels
is
still
mysterious to scientists. She mentions that NASA has stated that they are
still
unaware of the cause. The
lecturer
,
on the other hand
, claims that human activity is the main reason that resulted in impacting
sea
levels
. She illustrated what she means by elaborating that ice melting on land is the main cause resulted from another factor. She
subsequently
continues to state that burning fossil fuel is the most effecting factor.

Lastly
, the author posits that the same thing as what happened previously would happen again. According to the
article’s
writer, there is
enough
time to adjust.
In contrast
, the
lecturer’s
stance is that adjusting is not possible. She
makes
the statement that our economy
is based
everywhere including around water sources.
Therefore
, it would affect the country’s economic status as the landmass will decrease by approximately 20%.

To sum up, the
lecturer
and the
article’s
author have distinct perspectives. The
article’s
writer believes that the
increase
in
sea
levels
is not that
big
of a deal.
On the contrary
, the
lecturer
supposes that it is not as normal as
some
might argue.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The Increase of Sea Levels

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
399 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts