It is considered that the main purpose of the state is developing the life of an individual. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward and arguments could be made against the idea. It seems to me that every action made by the authority is related to enhancing the human's life, although some areas should not be forgotten by the authority.
Looking from one angle, those who support the idea that the regime should prioritize a person's life explain this there is not something that could be more valuable than individual life. Hence, it is necessary to provide more financial resources in order to improve each aspect of a person's life. For instance, such social institutions as education, health care, and the justice system must be heavily subsidized just for enhancing of folk's existence. Furthermore, assistants of this point of view claim that the more developed person's life, the better general life in the world.
Nevertheless, the opponents of this idea point out that there are other areas that should be financed by the authority. Despite the value of the person's life, there are other species in the world which also are considered not less valuable. Therefore the government should not omit the environment and, without a doubt, should provide money for its improvement. Because of the enhancing of surroundings influence not only on one individual life but also for the next generation in general.
Overall, all in the world are related to each other and if the power will be focus just on one aspect of life, another might degrade and this might affect an individual. For that reason, I strongly believe that the authority should use money consciously and wisely. 
It  
is considered
 that the main purpose of the state is developing the  
life
 of an  
individual
.  
However
, the issue is not  
entirely
 straightforward and arguments could  
be made
 against the  
idea
. It seems to me that every action made by the authority  
is related
 to enhancing the human's  
life
, although  
some
 areas should not  
be forgotten
 by the authority.
Looking from one angle, those who support the  
idea
 that the regime should prioritize a  
person's
  life
  explain
 this there is not something that could be more valuable than  
individual
  life
.  
Hence
, it is necessary to provide more financial resources in order to  
improve
 each aspect of a  
person's
  life
.  
For instance
, such social institutions as education, health care, and the justice system  
must
 be  
heavily
 subsidized  
just
 for enhancing of folk's existence.  
Furthermore
, assistants of this point of view claim that the more developed  
person's
  life
, the better general  
life
 in the world. 
Nevertheless
, the opponents of this  
idea
 point out that there are other areas that should  
be financed
 by the authority. Despite the value of the  
person's
  life
, there are other species in the world which  
also
  are considered
 not less valuable.  
Therefore
 the  
government
 should not omit the environment and, without a doubt, should provide money for its improvement.  
Because
 of the enhancing of surroundings influence not  
only
 on one  
individual
  life
  but
  also
 for the  
next
 generation  
in general
. 
Overall
, all in the world  
are related
 to each other and if the power will be focus  
just
 on one aspect of  
life
, another might degrade and this might affect an  
individual
. For that reason, I  
strongly
 believe that the authority should  
use
 money  
consciously
 and  
wisely
.