The government cannot fund all research projects because its budget is limited; therefore, some people insist that only research pertaining to the field of science and technology should receive government funding. While I do admit that scientific research should receive maximum funding, I totally disagree with the argument that the government should stop funding research in less ‘useful’ fields like arts or history.
Scientific research certainly provides tremendous value because scientific innovations have the power to change our lives for good. Take, for instance, the invention of the antibiotic. This wonder drug saved the lives of millions of people and continues to be a major lifesaver even today. The computer is also the result of scientific research. This invention changed the way we work and store information. Today, it is impossible to imagine a world without computers. Other inventions like electricity, motor vehicles and home appliances have also revolutionized our lives.
However, just because scientific research provides more value it does not mean that research in other ‘less useful’ fields should be discouraged. Of course, archeological research or research into the origin of languages is unlikely to have a massive impact on our day-to-day life. Yet, this information is crucial for understanding how we reached where we are today. The truth is that there are still a lot of things we can learn from previous generations. These kinds of research may even lead us to a common ancestor and that might put an end to the hostility prevailing between many nations. Historical research also teaches us about mistakes we must not repeat. The World Wars and the Genocide are two examples. Research on these horrific incidents keeps reminding us about the extent of damage they caused. If future generations do not learn about them, they might be tempted to commit the same mistakes again.
To conclude, not only scientific research but research in other fields also provides great value. Therefore, the argument that only scientific research should receive government funding does not hold water.
The
government
cannot fund all
research
projects
because
its budget
is limited
;
therefore
,
some
people
insist that
only
research
pertaining to the
field
of science and technology should receive
government
funding
. While I do admit that
scientific
research
should receive maximum
funding
, I
totally
disagree with the argument that the
government
should
stop
funding
research
in less ‘useful’
fields
like arts or history.
Scientific
research
certainly
provides tremendous value
because
scientific
innovations have the power to
change
our
lives
for
good
. Take,
for instance
, the invention of the antibiotic. This wonder drug saved the
lives
of millions of
people
and continues to be a major lifesaver even
today
. The computer is
also
the result of
scientific
research
. This invention
changed
the way we work and store information.
Today
, it is impossible to imagine a world without computers. Other inventions like electricity, motor vehicles and home appliances have
also
revolutionized our
lives
.
However
,
just
because
scientific
research
provides more value it does not mean that
research
in other ‘less useful’
fields
should
be discouraged
.
Of course
, archeological
research
or
research
into the origin of languages is unlikely to have a massive impact on our day-to-day life.
Yet
, this information is crucial for understanding how we reached where we are
today
. The truth is that there are
still
a lot of
things we can learn from previous generations. These kinds of
research
may even lead us to a common ancestor and that might put an
end
to the hostility prevailing between
many
nations. Historical
research
also
teaches us about mistakes we
must
not repeat. The World Wars and the Genocide are two examples.
Research
on these horrific incidents
keeps
reminding us about the extent of damage they caused. If future generations do not learn about them, they might
be tempted
to commit the same mistakes again.
To conclude
, not
only
scientific
research
but
research
in other
fields
also
provides great value.
Therefore
, the argument that
only
scientific
research
should receive
government
funding
does not hold water.