The reading and the lecture both are about the future impact of aquamarine agriculture. The author of the article states that if it is done in large scale, the unsustainable practises will increase in ocean and will lead to destroying the living creatures of ocean. However, the professor refutes all the claims made by author. He believes there will not be major impact and the living creatures will not be extinct due to aquamarine agriculture.
The first point the author states is that, in order to exactly located the minerals and resources, many of the ocean areas will be tore apart and the creatures will be devasted. On contrary, the professor says that, scientist can locate the gold or copper mines in ocean by digging into small area and hence there will not be much damage into the life of creatures in ocean territory.
Secondly, the author’s position is that, where ever the digging happens, the poison from the ocean bed will be dig up and circulated almost 1000 miles in ocean, and will devast creatures there. But professor claims, that the circulation will spread not more 100 miles and it will not matter much.
Lastly, author states, this will also affect the quality of fish and sea food as most of them will carry poison. Rebutting this claim, professor posits that, aquamarine agriculture mostly targeted to be carrying in dessert like areas, and hence no fishes that humans consume will not be affected and hence there will merely be any sea food quality degradation due to mining
The reading and the lecture both are about the future impact of aquamarine agriculture. The
author
of the article states that if it
is done
in large scale, the unsustainable
practises
will increase in
ocean
and will lead to destroying the living
creatures
of
ocean
.
However
, the
professor
refutes all the claims made by
author
. He believes there will not be major impact and the living
creatures
will not be extinct due to aquamarine agriculture.
The
first
point the
author
states is that, in order to exactly located the minerals and resources,
many
of the
ocean
areas will be
tore
apart and the
creatures
will be
devasted
. On contrary, the
professor
says that, scientist can locate the gold or copper mines in
ocean
by digging into
small
area and
hence
there will not be much damage into the life of
creatures
in
ocean
territory.
Secondly
, the
author’s
position is that, where ever the digging happens, the poison from the
ocean
bed will be dig up and circulated almost
1000 miles
in
ocean
, and will
devast
creatures
there.
But
professor
claims, that the circulation will spread not more
100 miles
and it will not matter much.
Lastly
,
author
states, this will
also
affect the quality of fish and sea food as most of them will carry poison. Rebutting this claim,
professor
posits that, aquamarine agriculture
mostly
targeted to be carrying in dessert like areas, and
hence
no fishes that humans consume will not be
affected
and
hence
there will
merely
be any sea food quality degradation due to
mining