The argument of mayor of the town of Hopewell seems plausible but meticulous analysis makes the argument specious. The argument is based on unwarranted assumptions and unsubstantiated conclusion. Following three questions must be answered in order to strengthen the argument.
Firstly, what are the causes behind the increment of the tourism in ocean view? The argument does not provide any information regarding the cause of the tourism increment and also states that new business have opened there. Might be the tourists are related to the business and not related to the golf course. This assumption weaken the argument.
Secondly, is the Ocean View's tax revenue increment by 30 percent related to the golf course? The argument does not state anything as such and may the percentage of tax levied was increased and as a result the revenue from tax also increased. The argument is based on the speculation that the golf course built two years ago resulted the rise in revenue by 30 percent but could not provide any plausible facts for the assumptions.
Finally, is the Hopewell's economy similar to the Ocean view? The mayor have compared the Hopewell's economy with the Ocean view economy without enough information regarding the similarity between them. May the Hopewell's economy is far different from that of Ocean View and building golf course and resort hotel is completely not related with Hopewell's economy.
In conclusion, the argument of the Mayor is fallacious and to strengthen the argument rigorous study must be done regarding the Ocean view's economy and Hopewell's economy. Above three questions must be mandatorily answered in order to bolster the mayor's argument instead of the unwarranted speculations.
The
argument
of mayor of the town of Hopewell seems plausible
but
meticulous analysis
makes
the
argument
specious. The
argument
is based
on unwarranted assumptions and unsubstantiated conclusion. Following three questions
must
be answered
in order to strengthen the argument.
Firstly
, what are the causes behind the increment of the tourism in
ocean
view
? The
argument
does not provide any information regarding the cause of the tourism increment and
also
states that new business have opened there. Might be the tourists are
related
to the business and not
related
to the golf
course
.
This assumption weaken
the argument.
Secondly
, is the
Ocean
View's tax revenue increment by 30 percent
related
to the golf
course
? The
argument
does not state anything as such and may the percentage of tax levied
was increased
and
as a result
the revenue from tax
also
increased. The
argument
is based
on the speculation that the golf
course
built two years ago resulted the rise in revenue by 30 percent
but
could not provide any plausible facts for the assumptions.
Finally
, is the Hopewell's
economy
similar to the
Ocean
view
? The mayor have compared the Hopewell's
economy
with the
Ocean
view
economy
without
enough
information regarding the similarity between them. May the Hopewell's
economy
is far
different
from that of
Ocean
View
and building golf
course
and resort hotel is completely not
related
with Hopewell's economy.
In conclusion
, the
argument
of the Mayor is fallacious and to strengthen the
argument
rigorous study
must
be done
regarding the
Ocean
view's
economy
and Hopewell's
economy
. Above three questions
must
be
mandatorily
answered in order to bolster the mayor's
argument
instead
of the unwarranted speculations.