Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to th

Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to th RN0jG
The article states that the new regulations regarding to the burning of the coal in power plants are unnecessary and this might have the negative consequences, and provides the three reasons in order to support the claim. However, the professor refutes this claim by stating the various reasons. Firstly, the article states that the environmental regulations are already in exists as they use the inner special material in order to prevent coal ash components from leaking into the soil and polluting the environment. However, the professor refute this claim by stating that the old disposal sides result in the leak of the harmful that get mixed with the drinking water and resulting the water pollution. Secondly, the article states that the provision of the strict rules and regulation will result in the discouragement of recycling of coal ash into other products such as concrete and bricks as well as results the buy of products. In contrary, the professor refute the claim by stating that the stricts rule will never result in the stop buying of products. She states that in the past, the presence of mercury in the high amount results the negative impact in the health, that's why the restriction has been done in the high use of the mercury in the different products but i donot result in the complete failure to sell the products as customer used to by these products regularly with concerning of the harmful effects. Thirdly, the article claims that the new restriction rules will result in the increased of the cost in the disposal and handling for power companies that will cause power company to increase the price of electricity which will not welcome by public. Howerver, the professor refutes this claim by stating that the strict rule regulation will results the one percent increase in the price of the electricity use, so, the people will unhappy regarding to this result as they are more concern in health.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
article
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
states
that the new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
The phrase 'regarding to' is not correct. Use "regarding" or "regard to".
regarding to
the burning of the coal in power plants are unnecessary and this might have the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
consequences, and provides the three reasons in order to support the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claim
.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
refutes
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claim
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stating
the various reasons.

Firstly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
article
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
states
that the environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulations
are already in exists as they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the inner special material in order to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
coal ash components from leaking into the soil and polluting the environment.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
refute
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claim
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stating
that the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
disposal sides
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
in the leak of the harmful that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
mixed with the drinking water and resulting the water pollution.

Secondly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
article
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
states
that the provision of the strict
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rules
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulation
will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
in the discouragement of recycling of coal ash into other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
such as concrete and bricks
as well
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
results
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
. In contrary, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
refute
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claim
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stating
that the
Possible spelling mistake found.
stricts
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rule
will never
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
buying of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
. She
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
states
that in the past, the presence of mercury in the high amount
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
results
the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
impact in the health, that's why the restriction has
been done
in the high
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of the mercury in the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
i
Possible spelling mistake found.
donot
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
in the complete failure to sell the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
as customer
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to by these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
regularly
with concerning of the harmful effects.

Thirdly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
article
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claims
that the new restriction
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rules
will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
in the increased of the cost in the disposal and handling for power
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
that will cause power
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
to increase the price of electricity which will not welcome by public.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Howerver
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
professor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
refutes
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
claim
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stating
that the strict
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rule
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regulation
will
The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: "result"
results
the one percent increase in the price of the electricity
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
will unhappy
The phrase 'regarding to' is not correct. Use "regarding" or "regard to".
regarding to
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
as they are more concern in health.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to th

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
325 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to th