The author's claim in the memorandum is that if the weather and local news program returned to the same time as it was previously, local businesses will return the contract which they had before. Moreover, there are some carpings about local news program regarding the national news program. If it is for the author to have a strong base in those assumptions, he should provide more proves for each of them.
First of all, it is stated that viewers complaint about weather and local news, however the author fails to prove the stated assumption. As it happened in period of one year, viewers may have changed their preferences for watching national news instead of local news. For example, those viewers who at first composed only by adults, now it may composed by merely teenagers who do not care about weather of watching local news.
Furthermore, the cancelation contracts may have happened due to the fact that there are no more people watching programs, thus local businesses are not having audience and not making any profits at all.
Moreover, stating that restoring the time devoted to weather and local news may not necessarily work again because as it was said previously the audience may have changed and then, those programs are unlikely to become successful again.
Finally, if the author wants to strenght his argument, he should have provided enough evidences which would support and be the basement for the argument at all.
The author's claim in the memorandum is that if the
weather
and
local
news
program
returned to the same time as it was previously,
local
businesses will return the contract which they had
before
.
Moreover
, there are
some
carpings
about
local
news
program
regarding the national
news
program
. If it is for the author to have a strong base in those assumptions, he should provide more proves for each of them.
First of all
, it
is stated
that
viewers
complaint about
weather
and
local
news
,
however
the author fails to prove the stated assumption. As it happened in period of one year, viewers may have
changed
their preferences for watching national
news
instead
of
local
news
.
For example
, those viewers who at
first
composed
only
by adults,
now
it may
composed
by
merely
teenagers
who do not care about
weather
of watching
local
news.
Furthermore
, the
cancelation
contracts may have happened due to the fact that there are no more
people
watching
programs
,
thus
local
businesses are not having audience and not making any profits at all.
Moreover
, stating that restoring the time devoted to
weather
and
local
news
may not
necessarily
work again
because
as it
was said
previously the audience may have
changed
and then, those
programs
are unlikely to become successful again.
Finally
, if the author wants to
strenght
his argument, he should have provided
enough
evidences which would support and be the basement for the argument at all.