The countries autonomy is based on a number of factors like the mindset of the people residing, the patriotism, relations with the neighboring people, intentions of the people and also corruption. However, according to the article, the autonomy of any country depends upon the strength of its borders only. The article provides a general information to supports its argument with a number of flaws which could be highlighted.
To start with, as mentioned earlier, the autonomy of any country is based on wider spectrum of factors and not just the border. Though border is a symbol of autonomy, however it is not the only reason. For example, the people of the country who are corrupt might destroy the country and its autonomy from within. In such cases, an immigrant is not necessarily the culprit.
Secondly, the articles says about the illegal immigrants that need to be checked, but nowhere mentions what the actual intentions of these immigrants were. A many would have come in search for jobs from poor countries who wouldn't be allowed otherwise, to earn a livelihood. It might also happen that these immigrants purposely not checked by the border security in return for bribe. An immigrant might harm the economy and pose a threat to national identity, but the article mentions no evidence regarding this. The illegal immigrants may or may not harm the national integrity of the country.
Also, the author mentions that because the illegal immigrants pose threats they must be sent back to their respective countries. However, if these immigrants who actually came in search of job, form the baseline of every industry to carry out degraded work at lower rates, the removal of such people would directly effect the economy.
Lastly, if actually there are threats, important must be given to prevention, rather than putting all the power to cure it. Border must be safeguarded and every immigrant must be checked thoroughly and his background must be assessed. His real intentions should be noted and only then a conclusion must be made. Hence, the argument does provide information and threats on the immigrants, but fails to provide any occurrence of national threat.
The
countries
autonomy
is based
on a number of factors like the mindset of the
people
residing, the patriotism, relations with the neighboring
people
, intentions of the
people
and
also
corruption.
However
, according to the
article
, the
autonomy
of any
country
depends upon the strength of its
borders
only
. The
article
provides
a general information
to supports its argument with a number of flaws which could
be highlighted
.
To
start
with, as mentioned earlier, the
autonomy
of any
country
is based
on wider spectrum of factors and not
just
the
border
. Though
border
is a symbol of
autonomy
,
however
it is not the
only
reason.
For example
, the
people
of the
country
who are corrupt might
destroy
the
country
and its
autonomy
from within. In such cases, an
immigrant
is not
necessarily
the culprit.
Secondly
, the
articles
says about the illegal
immigrants
that need to be
checked
,
but
nowhere mentions what the actual intentions of these
immigrants
were. A
many
would have
come
in search for jobs from poor
countries
who wouldn't be
allowed
otherwise
, to earn a livelihood. It might
also
happen that these
immigrants
purposely
not
checked
by the
border
security in return for bribe. An
immigrant
might harm the economy and pose a
threat
to national identity,
but
the
article
mentions no evidence regarding this. The illegal
immigrants
may or may not harm the national integrity of the country.
Also
, the author mentions that
because
the illegal
immigrants
pose
threats
they
must
be
sent
back to their respective
countries
.
However
, if these
immigrants
who actually came in search of job, form the baseline of every industry to carry out degraded work at lower rates, the removal of such
people
would
directly
effect
the economy.
Lastly
, if actually there are
threats
,
important
must
be
given
to prevention,
rather
than putting all the power to cure it.
Border
must
be safeguarded
and every
immigrant
must
be
checked
thoroughly
and his background
must
be assessed
. His real intentions should
be noted
and
only
then a conclusion
must
be made
.
Hence
, the argument does provide information and
threats
on the
immigrants
,
but
fails to provide any occurrence of national
threat
.