Pirouttes ballet School is the best choice of any kid to learn dance. The author concludes this based on the assumption that this particular school has most intensive program, teachers who danced in the prestigious ballet organizations and many of the students are professional dancers associated with the top dance companies. However, after more light is shed on the issue and more detailed facts are concerned, lack of answers through argument leads me to question its validity.
First of all, how effective is the program offered? In other words, how good is the program for a beginner? How good are teachers for students who are obdurate. There might be a case where student cannot cope up with the program which is intensive and kid might feel stressed. Stress doesn't help in learning dance. If the above mentioned scenario is true, then the argument is weakened.
Secondly, if a dancer dances in an even which is reputated does that mean they are good teachers? Dancing is different and teaching dance is different. Every good dancer cannot be a good teacher. It is possible that a person can have extreme dance skills but no teaching skills. This doesn't help in teaching dance for the kids. if the above assumption is merit, then the argument does not hold water.
Finally, did every student who learnt the dance from the school is successful? The author states that many of the students are associated with the top organizations but what is the percentage of the success ratio of the students who learnt from the school.
To conclude, the argument, stands as of now, is flawed. However, if the author provides more evidence ans answers to the above questions, then argument can be evaluaated possibly.
Pirouttes
ballet School is the best choice of any kid to learn
dance
. The author concludes this based on the assumption that this particular school has most intensive
program
,
teachers
who
danced in the prestigious ballet organizations and
many
of the
students
are professional dancers associated with the top
dance
companies
.
However
, after more light
is shed
on the issue and more detailed facts
are concerned
, lack of answers through
argument
leads me to question its validity.
First of all
, how effective is the
program
offered?
In other words
, how
good
is the
program
for a beginner? How
good
are
teachers
for
students
who
are obdurate. There might be a case where
student
cannot cope up with the
program
which is intensive and kid might feel
stressed
.
Stress
doesn't
help
in learning
dance
. If the above mentioned scenario is true, then the
argument
is weakened
.
Secondly
, if a dancer
dances
in an even which is
reputated
does that mean they are
good
teachers
? Dancing is
different
and teaching
dance
is
different
. Every
good
dancer cannot be a
good
teacher
. It is possible that a person can have extreme
dance
skills
but
no teaching
skills
. This doesn't
help
in teaching
dance
for the kids.
if
the above assumption is merit, then the
argument
does not hold water.
Finally
, did every
student
who
learnt
the
dance
from the school is successful? The author states that
many
of the
students
are associated
with the top organizations
but
what is the percentage of the success ratio of the
students
who
learnt
from the school.
To conclude
, the
argument
, stands as of
now
,
is flawed
.
However
, if the author provides more evidence ans answers to the above questions, then
argument
can be
evaluaated
possibly
.