Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The following are measures which will be considered to assure the reliability of the research

The following are measures which will be considered to assure the reliability of the research jRDdw
- Replicability: It refers the act of repeating things for another time in order to avoid the error which was done at first. This will be achieved through preparing research materials for instance, and revise them a couple times to ensure the accuracy of what is meant to be in the search tools. Also, replicability will be done during data analysis phase, where transcripts will be written carefully and rechecked another time, and when they are being used. - Standardization: This process involves having data that are conforming to a certain standard. This can be realized through creating standardized search tools, for instance standard questionnaire (Verhoeven, 2015) in order to acquire the exact information that is needed. This will be achieved through preparing for instance interview questionnaires beforehand to assure that the topics that need to be investigated are all introduced and are asked in the most appropriate ways. - Pilots: It refers to techniques of enhancing the reliability of the research topics by making a test interview (Verhoeven, 2015). This will be achieved through making some test interviews with one of my colleagues at Synano B. V. - Peer feedback: This refers to having the research tools, collected data and reports being checked by peer to leverage the accuracy of information (Verhoeven, 2015). . This will be achieved through getting feedbacks from my thesis supervisor and my company coach. - Report and Justification: This refers to keeping records of what has been done, time and the progress, for instance by using logbook (Verhoeven, 2015). This will be achieved by using the general thesis timeline and personal agenda. The second variable of credibility is Validity. It refers to the level in which the research is free of systematic errors (Verhoeven, 2015). Systematic error occurs as when the respondent is intentionally giving the wrong answer. This can be done due to the type of topics or personal (Verhoeven, 2015). There is also internal validity and external validity. Internal validity is when can make a right conclusion from them(results) and external validity is basically related to the sample or size of sample. The measures that will be taken to consider the validity of the research include: - Selection of participant: a self-selection as our sampling method that shows how the results from our respondents are valid.
Consider using an m-dash in dialogues and enumerations.
-
Replicability: It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
refers
the act of repeating things for another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
in order to avoid the error which
was done
at
first
. This will be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
achieved
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
through
preparing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
materials for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
instance
, and revise them a
Did you mean "couple of"? (In formal written English 'of' should follow 'couple'.)
couple
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
times
to ensure the accuracy of what
is meant
to be in the search tools.
Also
, replicability will
be done
during data analysis phase, where transcripts will
be written
carefully
and rechecked another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
, and when they are being
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
.

Consider using an m-dash in dialogues and enumerations.
-
Standardization: This process involves having data that are conforming to a certain standard. This can
be realized
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
through
creating standardized search tools, for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
instance
standard questionnaire (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Verhoeven
, 2015) in order to acquire the exact information that
is needed
. This will be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
achieved
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
through
preparing for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
instance
interview questionnaires beforehand to assure that the topics that need to
be investigated
are all introduced and
are asked
in the most appropriate ways.

Consider using an m-dash in dialogues and enumerations.
-
Pilots: It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
refers
to techniques of enhancing the reliability of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
topics by making a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
interview (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Verhoeven
, 2015). This will be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
achieved
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
through
making
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
interviews with one of my colleagues at
Possible spelling mistake found.
Synano
B. V.

Consider using an m-dash in dialogues and enumerations.
-
Peer feedback: This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
refers
to having the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
tools, collected data and reports being
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
checked
by peer to leverage the accuracy of information (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Verhoeven
, 2015).
Don't put a space before the full stop
.
This will be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
achieved
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
through
getting feedbacks from my thesis supervisor and my
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
coach.

Consider using an m-dash in dialogues and enumerations.
-
Report and Justification: This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
refers
to keeping records of what has
been done
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
and the progress, for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
instance
by using logbook (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Verhoeven
, 2015). This will be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
achieved
by using the general thesis timeline and personal agenda.

The second variable of credibility is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Validity
. It
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
refers
to the level in which the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
is free of systematic errors (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Verhoeven
, 2015). Systematic error occurs as when the respondent is
intentionally
giving the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
answer. This can
be done
due to the type of topics or personal (
Possible spelling mistake found.
Verhoeven
, 2015).

There is
also
internal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
validity
and external
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
validity
. Internal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
validity
is when can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
a right conclusion from them(results) and external
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
validity
is
basically
related to the sample or size of sample.

The measures that will
be taken
to consider the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
validity
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
include:

Consider using an m-dash in dialogues and enumerations.
-
Selection of participant: a self-selection as our sampling method that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
how the results from our respondents are valid.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The following are measures which will be considered to assure the reliability of the research

Essay
  American English
9 paragraphs
378 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts