In the memo, the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc. suggests that they should discontinue use of the Endure manufacturing process to increase their profits. At first glance, the suggestion sounds persuasive; however, the lack of specific evidence leads me to conclude that this argument is unsound on many grounds.
First of all, the author needs to provide more sound evidence to take the survey at face value and deduce that retaining Endure manufacturing process is waste of money. Since he does not clarify the number of people who answered the questions and we also cannot assume the age and type of people. Therefore, it is hard to believe this survey. Even if the result of the survey is credible, the author cannot corroborate that the process is waste of money due to the fact that their average customer purchases new socks frequently. However, it is possible that their customers bought their socks because they like the durability of socks, and in this case, we cannot regard the process is unnecessary.
Secondly, more concrete evidence is necessary to support the author’s contention that durability of their socks is not regarded as their most attractive factor based on the survey in northeastern United States cities. Since the survey was taken only in the part of United States, even though the northeastern cities are their largest market, the penchants or customers cannot be generalized as the preference of all customers. Also, it is far-fetched to say that customers do not consider the durability because they most value the appearance of their socks.
Last but not least, the author needs to supplement the argument with more information to conclude that discontinuing use of the process can increase their profits. In all likelihood, there may be a plethora of customers who choose Dura-Socks because of their durability, even though they are not express their opinion or they are not the major customers. In this case, those customers will change their socks if their durability is deteriorated, and the loss can override the saving costs by discontinuing the process. Therefore, without ruling out other possibilities, the author cannot insist discontinuing the Endure manufacturing process.
In brief, this argument is illogical in many respects. In order to bolster this argument, the author needs to offer more evidence to support his argument.
In the memo, the vice president of marketing at
Dura-Sock
, Inc. suggests that they should discontinue
use
of
the Endure
manufacturing
process
to increase their profits. At
first
glance, the suggestion sounds persuasive;
however
, the lack of specific
evidence
leads me
to conclude
that this
argument
is unsound on
many
grounds.
First of all
, the
author
needs to provide more sound
evidence
to take the
survey
at face value and deduce that retaining Endure manufacturing
process
is waste of money. Since he does not clarify the number of
people
who answered the
questions and
we
also
cannot assume the age and type of
people
.
Therefore
, it is
hard
to believe this
survey
. Even if the result of the
survey
is credible, the
author
cannot corroborate that the
process
is waste of money due to the fact that their average
customer
purchases
new
socks
frequently
.
However
, it is possible that their
customers
bought
their
socks
because
they like the
durability
of
socks
, and
in this case
, we cannot regard the
process
is unnecessary.
Secondly
, more concrete
evidence
is necessary to support the
author’s
contention that
durability
of their
socks
is not regarded as their most attractive factor based on the
survey
in northeastern United States cities. Since the
survey
was taken
only
in the part
of United States
,
even though
the northeastern cities are their largest market, the penchants or
customers
cannot
be generalized
as the preference of all
customers
.
Also
, it is far-fetched to say that
customers
do not consider the
durability
because
they most value the appearance of their socks.
Last
but
not least, the
author
needs to supplement the
argument
with more information
to conclude
that discontinuing
use
of the
process
can increase their profits. In all likelihood, there may be a plethora of
customers
who choose
Dura-Socks
because
of their
durability
,
even though
they are not express their
opinion or
they are not the major
customers
.
In this case
, those
customers
will
change
their
socks
if their
durability
is deteriorated
, and the loss can override the saving costs by discontinuing the
process
.
Therefore
, without ruling out other possibilities, the
author
cannot insist discontinuing
the Endure
manufacturing process.
In brief
, this
argument
is illogical in
many
respects. In order to bolster this
argument
, the
author
needs to offer more
evidence
to support his
argument
.