The author argument mention they want to hire a teacher who can teach Latin to the children. However, this conclusion was flawed. Because there is just one study on this subject, the relation between the number of job seekers for a demanding job was not considered, and the relation between studying Latin and critical thinking was not clear.
Firstly, There is one study one the relation between learning Latin and logic and critical thinking. It is a known fact being bilingual help student developing their thinking and broaden their horizon. So if the dean of the school say only children should learn Latin is not true. Every new language can help them develop their brain and become more familiar with logic.
Secondly, there is a study that relates the Latin to the critical thinking. There is no evidence about the place and the age group of the participant. It is reasonable to use and learn about these people and family background the place they raise. In most case, For example, if the children have family tutor they learn Latin more frequency, they will good at math. One the other hand, The children who spend much more time with a bad friend it does not have a good result.
Thirdly, In nowadays life the number of the people who study Latin is low. So they could find the job easier than other people. There is no grantee if the number of people surges, Finding the job is also Increase. It is sensible when the number increase dramatically, the job offer and the salary will decrease. So encourage children with different capability for learning the new language is not realistic.
In the conclusion, according to the author, school want to change the circulation according to a new job opportunity, one study that the relation between the study and the conclusion was not transparent. For changing the student timetable need lots of think and consideration.
The author argument mention they want to hire a teacher who can teach
Latin
to the
children
.
However
, this conclusion
was flawed
.
Because
there is
just
one
study
on this subject, the
relation
between the
number
of
job
seekers for a demanding
job
was not considered, and the
relation
between studying
Latin
and critical
thinking
was not
clear
.
Firstly
, There is one
study
one the
relation
between learning
Latin
and logic and critical
thinking
. It is a known fact being bilingual
help
student developing their
thinking
and broaden their horizon.
So if
the dean of the school say
only
children
should learn
Latin
is not true. Every new language can
help
them develop their brain and become more familiar with logic.
Secondly
, there is a
study
that relates the
Latin
to the critical
thinking
. There is no evidence about the place and the age group of the participant. It is reasonable to
use
and learn about these
people
and family background the place they raise. In most case,
For example
, if the
children
have family tutor they learn
Latin
more frequency, they will
good
at math.
One
the other hand, The
children
who spend much more time with a
bad
friend it does not have a
good
result.
Thirdly
,
In nowadays
life the
number
of the
people
who
study
Latin
is low.
So
they could find the
job
easier than other
people
. There is no grantee if the
number
of
people
surges, Finding the
job
is
also
Increase
. It is sensible when the
number
increase
dramatically
, the
job
offer and the salary will decrease.
So
encourage
children
with
different
capability for learning the new language is not realistic.
In the conclusion, according to the author, school want to
change
the circulation according to a new
job
opportunity, one
study
that the
relation
between the
study
and the conclusion was not transparent. For changing the student timetable need lots of
think
and consideration.