Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far

In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far 0ABqG
The crux of the argument was that CleanAll should be used as industrial cleanser cause employees to have less sick days compared to others, where working buildings cleanse with CleanAll. Also, CleanAll was found more efficient that next cleanser. The argument based on unwarranted assumptions and flawed for the following reasons. Primarily, the author claimed that CleanAll found to remove more dirt and bacteria than next best cleaner. The ambiguity of the argument was about how that study conducted and how many cleansers were compared with CleanAll, and also how did they found the best cleanser. The product must be compared to the other thousands of products. Also, before launching the product must be tested by people. Since there is no data from the author which proves that people's gave their positive review on the product. The author also claimed that the cleanser was tested on industrial building and the employees had fewer sick days compared to other companies. Again, the author does not provide any information about how many working buildings took part in that survey. It might be possible that the CleanAll company chooses industrial buildings where employees were healthier than other companies. It might also possible that the office building had an air purifier or might be the workers are overall healthier than other companies. The following argument is flawed and based on unwarranted reasons and also failed to provide any convincing data which can corroborate the authors' claim. The author conducted two studies but does not provide the sample numbers or number of the product tested against the CleanAll. Since the data are incomplete it would be unfeasible to conclude that the CleanAll should be used as an industrial cleaner.
The crux of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
was that
Possible spelling mistake found.
CleanAll
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industrial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleanser
cause employees to have less sick days compared to others, where working
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
cleanse with
Possible spelling mistake found.
CleanAll
.
Also
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
CleanAll
was found
more efficient that
next
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleanser
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
based on unwarranted assumptions and flawed for the following reasons.

Primarily
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
claimed that
Possible spelling mistake found.
CleanAll
found to remove more dirt and bacteria than
next
best cleaner. The ambiguity of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
was about how that study conducted and how
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleansers
were compared
with
Possible spelling mistake found.
CleanAll
, and
also
how did they found the best
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleanser
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
product
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be compared
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
thousands of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
.
Also
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
launching the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
product
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
by
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.
“Since” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Since
there is no data from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
which proves that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
's gave their
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
review on the product.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
also
claimed that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cleanser
was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industrial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
and the employees had fewer sick days compared to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
. Again, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
does not provide any information about how
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
working
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
took part
in that survey. It might be possible that the
Possible spelling mistake found.
CleanAll
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
chooses
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industrial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
where employees were healthier than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
. It might
also
possible that the office
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
had an air purifier or might be the workers are
overall
healthier than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
.

The following
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
is flawed
and based on unwarranted reasons and
also
failed to provide any convincing data which can corroborate the authors' claim. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
author
conducted two studies
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
does not provide the sample numbers or number of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
product
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
against the
Possible spelling mistake found.
CleanAll
. Since the data are incomplete it would be unfeasible
to conclude
that the
Possible spelling mistake found.
CleanAll
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industrial
cleaner.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
284 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far