The planning committee predicts increase in adult population in the Calatrava city and thus suggests allocation of extra budget for adult facilities and programs by cutting the budget allocated to the education and children recreational facilities. The argument of the committee is presumptuous and makes sweeping conclusion even when there is lack of evidence to come to any solid conclusion.
To begin with, the committee cites the declining birth rate of the Calatrava city and thus concludes that number of students enrolling to schools will decrease dramatically in next ten years. It is completely wrong on part of committee to consider that the trend of decline in birth rate will continuously follow for upcoming ten years. The committe should provide insightful scientific data that reports the population of the Calatrava city for atleast next ten years. It may happen that from next year, the birth of the city starts increasing and consequently more number of students need education facilities than before. In such scenario, If budget of the education is reduced, education system in the city will collapse and create a chaos for students. Also, the committee has completely overlooked many of the external factors like migration while coming to a conclusion. Hence, committee should provide information as such about the current influx rate of migration to the city and also provide information whether this rate is increasing or decreasing. Hence, without such evidence, any conclusion about future enrollment in schools of city is flawed.
Next, the committee also suggests that the funding for athletic activities and other recreational activites should be reduced due to expected decline in number of students enrolled to school and instead diverted to make adult facilities. First of all, it is not clear whether students enrollment to school will decrease or not, and thus to base any conclusion upon this faulty premise is a big mistake and thus makes argument flawed.
At last the committee predicts that adult population in the city will increase. This claim is not backed by any evidence. The committee must provide stastics reporting total number of adult population predicted for next ten years. But the evidence that it must furnish must contain population of adults acoording to age groups. For it is possible that the committees’ plan to increase funding for adult facilities will only be useful if most of the adults are old. Because, if most of the adults are middle aged it is quite possible that they will have children in near future and thus number of students enrolling to schools will automatically go up and more funding for education will be needed.
Hence, in conclusion, the committee must provide warranted data predicting future birth rate of city for at least ten years, expected influx migration population in next ten years, and projected population of adults as per their age group for atleast next ten years. Because, without these supporting evidence as of now, the argument of the committee if flawed and not persuasive.
The planning
committee
predicts increase in adult
population
in the
Calatrava
city and
thus
suggests allocation of extra budget for adult facilities and programs by cutting the budget allocated to the
education
and children recreational facilities. The argument of the
committee
is presumptuous and
makes
sweeping
conclusion
even when there is lack of
evidence
to
come
to any solid conclusion.
To
begin
with, the
committee
cites the declining
birth
rate
of the
Calatrava
city and
thus
concludes that
number
of
students
enrolling to
schools
will decrease
dramatically
in
next
ten years. It is completely
wrong
on part of
committee
to consider that the trend of decline in
birth
rate
will
continuously
follow for upcoming ten years. The
committe
should
provide
insightful scientific data that reports the
population
of the
Calatrava
city for
atleast
next
ten years. It may happen that from
next
year
, the
birth
of the city
starts
increasing and
consequently
more
number
of
students
need
education
facilities than
before
. In such scenario, If budget of the
education
is
reduced
,
education
system in the city will collapse and create a chaos for
students
.
Also
, the
committee
has completely overlooked
many
of the external factors like migration while coming to a
conclusion
.
Hence
,
committee
should
provide
information as such about the
current
influx
rate
of migration to the city and
also
provide
information whether this
rate
is increasing or decreasing.
Hence
, without such
evidence
, any
conclusion
about future enrollment in
schools
of city
is flawed
.
Next
, the
committee
also
suggests that the funding for athletic activities and other recreational
activites
should be
reduced
due to
expected
decline in
number
of
students
enrolled to
school
and
instead
diverted to
make
adult facilities.
First of all
, it is not
clear
whether
students
enrollment to
school
will decrease or not, and
thus
to base any
conclusion
upon this faulty premise is a
big
mistake and
thus
makes
argument flawed.
At last the
committee
predicts that adult
population
in the city will increase. This claim is not backed by any
evidence
. The
committee
must
provide
stastics
reporting total
number
of adult
population
predicted for
next
ten years.
But
the
evidence
that it
must
furnish
must
contain
population
of
adults
acoording
to age groups. For it is possible that the
committees’
plan to increase funding for adult facilities will
only
be useful if most of the
adults
are
old
.
Because
, if most of the
adults
are
middle aged
it is quite possible that they will have children in near future and
thus
number
of
students
enrolling to
schools
will
automatically
go up and more funding for
education
will
be needed
.
Hence
, in
conclusion
, the
committee
must
provide
warranted data predicting future
birth
rate
of city for at least ten years,
expected
influx migration
population
in
next
ten years, and projected
population
of
adults
as per their age group for
atleast
next
ten years.
Because
, without these supporting
evidence
as of
now
, the argument of the
committee
if flawed and not persuasive.