Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio."We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previous

A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio. " We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previous jRDp8
The movie producer in his memo has made certain requests which rely heavily on unsubstantiated claims being made. No doubt, a number of assumptions have been made to further his/her point of increasing the funding by 10% in order to deliver a quality product. The most basic assumption in itself is that an increase in funding is necessary to ensure a quality movie. There are many aspects to a movie which contribute to its quality like acting, storyline, etc but an assumption on the causal relationship of funding and quality is being made. It can very well be the case that inspite of increasing the funding by 10% the movie still ends up being a subpar quality product. The producer further makes an assumption regarding the working style of the diretor on board. Since the director comes from the advertising business, it is assumed that his work style is wasteful. The statement that the advertising business is wasteful is a liberal assumption itself. But to further assume that the working style of the movie's director will also be wasteful is also far fetched. The director, while directing the movie, might change his work style to suit the demands of the movie industry. In case this assumption of the producer is proven false then the request for 10% additional funding would be entirely unnecessary. The movie might be finished with the available funding itself. The producer also assumes that the inexperienced assistant directors and producers which have been hired to work on the project would be necessary inefficient and will resultantly cost the project more money. Firstly there is an assumption that the relative inexperience will translate to longer time required to arrange sets. Even if this assumption is proven correct there is the further assumption that the actors and unionized crew will have to wait for such arrangments to be made and therefore will have to be paid overtime. This whole argument is based on various assumptions, even one of which proven to be false will make the whole argument void. If the relative inexperience does give rise to delayed arrangements on set it is not necessary that the actors and crew have to work overtime, the arrangments can be so scheduled beforehand so that nobody has to work overtime and zero waiting time is accrued. Also, it is assumed that even if overtime has to be paid it much more than the money saved on hiring the relatively inexperience staff on board. If this assumption is proven false then again the demand for increase in funds will not have its thrust. All in all, the move producer's demand for 10% increase is based on a number of assumptions regarding the possible problems which might be encountered once the filming begins. Most of the problems ennumerated arise out of the expected ineffciency and wasteful methods of the director or assistant director and producers. This assumptions can either prove right or wrong. But in case they prove wrong then the increase in funding is absolutely frivolous. In any case the increase in funding does not necessarily assure a quality product.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
movie
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
producer
in his memo has made certain requests which rely
heavily
on unsubstantiated claims
being made
. No doubt, a number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumptions
have
been made
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
further
his/her point of increasing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
funding
by 10% in order to deliver a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
product. The most basic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumption
in itself is that an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
funding
is necessary to ensure a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
movie
. There are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
aspects to a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
movie
which contribute to its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
like acting, storyline, etc
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumption
on the causal relationship of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
funding
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
is
being made
. It can
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
well be the case that
Possible spelling mistake found.
inspite
of increasing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
funding
by 10% the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
movie
still
ends up being a subpar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
product.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
producer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
further
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumption
regarding the working
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
style
of the
Possible spelling mistake found.
diretor
on board. Since the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
director
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
from the advertising business, it
is assumed
that his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
style
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wasteful
. The statement that the advertising business is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wasteful
is a liberal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumption
itself.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
further
assume that the working
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
style
of the movie's
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
director
will
also
be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wasteful
is
also
This expression is normally spelled as one or with hyphen.
far fetched
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
director
, while directing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
movie
, might
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
style
to suit the demands of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
movie
industry. In case this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumption
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
producer
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proven
false then the request for 10% additional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
funding
would be
entirely
unnecessary. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
movie
might
be finished
with the available
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
funding
itself.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
producer
also
assumes that the inexperienced assistant
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
directors
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
producers
which have
been hired
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
on the project would be necessary inefficient and will
resultantly
cost the project more money.
Firstly
there is an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumption
that the relative inexperience will translate to longer time required to arrange sets. Even if this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumption
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proven
correct there is the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
further
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumption
that the actors and unionized crew will
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
wait for such
Possible spelling mistake found.
arrangments
to
be made
and
therefore
will
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
be paid
overtime. This whole argument
is based
on various
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumptions
, even one of which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proven
to be false will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the whole argument void. If the relative inexperience does give rise to delayed arrangements on set it is not necessary that the actors and crew
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
overtime, the
Possible spelling mistake found.
arrangments
can be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
scheduled beforehand
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that nobody
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
overtime and zero waiting time
is accrued
.
Also
, it
is assumed
that even if overtime
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
be paid
it much more than the money saved on hiring the
relatively
inexperience staff on board. If this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumption
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proven
false then again the demand for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in funds will not have its thrust.

All in all, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
producer's demand for 10%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
is based
on a number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumptions
regarding the possible problems which might
be encountered
once the filming
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begins
. Most of the problems
Possible spelling mistake found.
ennumerated
arise out of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
Possible spelling mistake found.
ineffciency
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wasteful
methods of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
director
or assistant
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
director
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
producers
.
Did you mean "these"?
This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
assumptions
can either prove right or
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
in case they prove
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
then the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
funding
is
absolutely
frivolous. In any case the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
funding
does not
necessarily
assure a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
product.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio. " We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previous

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
519 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio."We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previous