Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

These days, vehicles have been popularized all around the world, where, a myriad of citizens own a car. However, it is claimed by international law, that more ecological ways of transportation should be encouraged, and drivers controlled car ownership. This essay will argue, why I agree with the necessities of this step. On the one hand, owning a property is the right of everyone written in the law. Therefore, any restrictions would be totally against rules. In addition, customers pay their money for having that car. Moreover, it is known some countries have already implemented requirements for foreign drivers crossing their borders. For example, in Sweden is forbidden to drive a vehicle with the brand "JEEP", because of the number of fossil fuels created by one car per year. Due to this, several minorities would not be in favour of controlling, while some rules exist so far, and it is not essential to start new. In contrast, not every government has passed rules for decreasing emissions and pollution. Consequently, this is causing environmental issues, such as global warming. The reason for this is human´s carelessness and a lack of education in ecology as a subject. Furthermore, cars are producing an ample amount of fossil fuels on the roads. For instance, Hong Kong´s everyday traffic jams. This leads to the concentration of emissions in the same place, where people are getting in the contact with polluted air, which is not healthy. As a result of controlling ownership, the troubles connected to the cars would be reduced and it would slow global warming. In conclusion, this essay argued, why controlling is vital for a more ecology-friendly society. I certainly believe the dropped usage of cars would help nature. Despite the fact, tiny groups would not be satisfied, the health of our planet and humankind is much more important.

These days, vehicles have been popularized
 all around the world, where, a myriad of citizens Possible agreement error. Did you mean “owns”? (Some collective nouns can be treated as both singular and plural, so ‘own’ is not always incorrect.)owns
own
 a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
car
. However
, it is claimed
 by international law, that more ecological ways of transportation should be encouraged
, and drivers controlled You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
car
 ownership. This essay will argue, why I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with the necessities of this step.

On the one hand, owning a property is the right of everyone written in the law. Therefore
, any restrictions would be totally
 against This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
. In addition
, customers pay their money for having that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
car
. Moreover
, it is known
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 countries have already implemented requirements for foreign drivers crossing their borders. For example
, in Sweden is forbidden
 to drive a vehicle with the brand Use a smart opening quote here.“
"
JEEPUse a smart closing quote here.”
"
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the number of fossil fuels created by one You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
car
 per year. Due to this, several minorities would not be in Possible spelling mistake. ‘favour’ is British English.favor
favour
 of controlling, while This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 exist This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 far, and it is not essential to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 new.

In contrast
, not every This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 has passed This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 for decreasing emissions and pollution. Consequently
, this is causing environmental issues, such as global warming. The reason for this is
The character between ‘human’ and ‘s’ is an accent character, not a standard apostrophe character. Use “human’s” (curly apostrophe) or “human’s” (straight apostrophe).human’shuman's
human´s
 carelessness and a lack of education in ecology as a subject. Furthermore
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 are producing an ample amount of fossil fuels on the roads. For instance
, Hong The character between ‘Kong’ and ‘s’ is an accent character, not a standard apostrophe character. Use “Kong’s” (curly apostrophe) or “Kong’s” (straight apostrophe).Kong’sKong's
Kong´s
 everyday traffic jams. This leads to the concentration of emissions in the same place, where This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 are getting in the contact with polluted air, which is not healthy. As a result
 of controlling ownership, the troubles connected to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 would be Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).reduced, and
reduced and
 it would slow global warming.

In conclusion
, this essay argued, why controlling is vital for a more ecology-friendly society. I certainly
 believe the dropped usage of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 would This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 nature. Despite the fact, tiny groups would not be satisfied
, the health of our planet and humankind is much more This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
. 