These days, vehicles have been popularized all around the world, where, a myriad of citizens own a car. However, it is claimed by international law, that more ecological ways of transportation should be encouraged, and drivers controlled car ownership. This essay will argue, why I agree with the necessities of this step.
On the one hand, owning a property is the right of everyone written in the law. Therefore, any restrictions would be totally against rules. In addition, customers pay their money for having that car. Moreover, it is known some countries have already implemented requirements for foreign drivers crossing their borders. For example, in Sweden is forbidden to drive a vehicle with the brand "JEEP", because of the number of fossil fuels created by one car per year. Due to this, several minorities would not be in favour of controlling, while some rules exist so far, and it is not essential to start new.
In contrast, not every government has passed rules for decreasing emissions and pollution. Consequently, this is causing environmental issues, such as global warming. The reason for this is human´s carelessness and a lack of education in ecology as a subject. Furthermore, cars are producing an ample amount of fossil fuels on the roads. For instance, Hong Kong´s everyday traffic jams. This leads to the concentration of emissions in the same place, where people are getting in the contact with polluted air, which is not healthy. As a result of controlling ownership, the troubles connected to the cars would be reduced and it would slow global warming.
In conclusion, this essay argued, why controlling is vital for a more ecology-friendly society. I certainly believe the dropped usage of cars would help nature. Despite the fact, tiny groups would not be satisfied, the health of our planet and humankind is much more important.
These days, vehicles have
been popularized
all around the world, where, a myriad of citizens
own
a
car
.
However
, it
is claimed
by international law, that more ecological ways of transportation should
be encouraged
, and drivers controlled
car
ownership. This essay will argue, why I
agree
with the necessities of this step.
On the one hand, owning a property is the right of everyone written in the law.
Therefore
, any restrictions would be
totally
against
rules
.
In addition
, customers pay their money for having that
car
.
Moreover
, it
is known
some
countries have already implemented requirements for foreign drivers crossing their borders.
For example
, in Sweden
is forbidden
to drive a vehicle with the brand
"
JEEP
"
,
because
of the number of fossil fuels created by one
car
per year. Due to this, several minorities would not be in
favour
of controlling, while
some
rules
exist
so
far, and it is not essential to
start
new.
In contrast
, not every
government
has passed
rules
for decreasing emissions and pollution.
Consequently
, this is causing environmental issues, such as global warming.
The reason for this is
human´s
carelessness and a lack of education in ecology as a subject.
Furthermore
,
cars
are producing an ample amount of fossil fuels on the roads.
For instance
, Hong
Kong´s
everyday traffic jams. This leads to the concentration of emissions in the same place, where
people
are getting in the contact with polluted air, which is not healthy.
As a result
of controlling ownership, the troubles connected to the
cars
would be
reduced and
it would slow global warming.
In conclusion
, this essay argued, why controlling is vital for a more ecology-friendly society. I
certainly
believe the dropped usage of
cars
would
help
nature. Despite the fact, tiny groups would not
be satisfied
, the health of our planet and humankind is much more
important
.