It is believed by most companies that workers ought to be corporately dressed, whereas some others agree that the quality of work is more important than dressing smartly. In my opinion, I completely agree to the fact that an employee's work outcome should be the focus instead of the way they dress. This essay will explain both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, most business owners pay more attention to how their work force dresses because they believe that a man's appearance matters most in business. Also, it is the first thing a potential client sees and this can either motivate or discourage them from transacting with such individual. For example, bankers in Nigeria are well known for wearing corporate clothing and this has earned them a lot of respect and enhanced their acceptability by both their customers and the society as a whole. Casually dressed bankers are not recognised especially when they go out for marketing purposes. In essence, putting on smart clothing is essential for smooth running of business.
On the other hand, the quality of work rather than corporate uniform is of more importance to some employers due to the fact the a person's ability or knnowledge can not be judged by the cloth they wear. Someone can be so formal in their outfit and have zero skill or required knowledge. In addition, formal outfits can be uncomfortable and in order to allow workers to be at ease while working, these companies, therefore, give their employees the opportunity to put on whatever they want. For instance, my husband, who graduated as a first class student from the university turned down a job offer because one of their requirements is to be clothed in a corporate uniform. This company, in my opinion, lost a valuable potential employee simply because of a flimsy criteria.
In conclusion, an individual's work capacity should be the main focus of organizations rather than their uniforms. 
It  
is believed
 by most  
companies
 that workers ought to be  
corporately
 dressed, whereas  
some
 others  
agree
 that the quality of  
work
 is more  
important
 than dressing  
smartly
. In my opinion, I completely  
agree
 to the fact that an employee's  
work
 outcome should be the focus  
instead
 of the way they dress. This essay will  
explain
 both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, most business owners pay more attention to how their  
work
 force dresses  
because
 they believe that a  
man
's appearance matters most in business.  
Also
, it is the  
first
 thing a potential client  
sees
 and this can either motivate or discourage them from transacting with such individual.  
For example
, bankers in Nigeria are well known for wearing corporate clothing and this has earned them  
a lot of
 respect and enhanced their acceptability by both their customers and the society as a whole.  
Casually
 dressed bankers are not  
recognised
  especially
 when they go out for marketing purposes. In essence, putting on smart clothing is essential for smooth running of business. 
On the other hand
, the quality of  
work
  rather
 than corporate uniform is of more importance to  
some
 employers due to the fact  
the a
 person's ability or  
knnowledge
 can not  
be judged
 by the cloth they wear. Someone can be  
so
 formal in their outfit and have zero  
skill
 or required knowledge.  
In addition
, formal outfits can be uncomfortable and in order to  
allow
 workers to be at  
ease
 while working, these  
companies
,  
therefore
, give their employees the opportunity to put on whatever they want.  
For instance
, my husband, who graduated as a  
first
  class
 student from the university turned down a job offer  
because
 one of their requirements is to  
be clothed
 in a corporate uniform. This  
company
, in my opinion, lost a valuable potential employee  
simply
  because
 of a flimsy  
criteria
. 
In conclusion
, an individual's  
work
 capacity should be the main focus of organizations  
rather
 than their uniforms.