Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The death penalty should be available as a punishment for serious crimes. To what extent do you agree?

The death penalty should be available as a punishment for serious crimes. PVRrg
Some believe that the death sentence should be applied for the gravest offences. I totally disagree with this statement and the following essay will examine the negative aspects of this movement. To begin with, the major nuance which detracts from the beneficial points of the heavy penalty is the fact that in several cases it is hard to be absolutely sure for a judge who is guilty. In other words, while for some situation there are video or audio records where it is obvious that a person committed a crime, for others the evidence of an offence is based on someone's comments or other facts, and a person can wrongly be assumed as a criminal. As a case in point, in Russia, the capital penalty had been available in the justice system until it was revealed that a hundred people were mistakenly incarcerated and killed. Thus, the government decided to alter the justice system and exclude this measure at all. In addition, another point which should be taken into consideration when it comes to a death sentence is that it is totally against the р, and it returns us back to the ancient moral aspects and traditions. To put it differently, for several centuries societies shift their emphasis to the actions which can help to defend the human rights and maintain a healthy and stable relationship between humans, so they reject violence and other inappropriate actions. From my point of view, capital punishment is a step back to norms and traditions which took place with ancient people, and it can potentially destroy our existing rules and habits. As a result, by accepting this heavy measure governments will probably modify our attitude regarding humanity in general. In conclusion, we are all too familiar with the debatable question whether the heavy sentence should exist for serious criminals or it is better to avoid such a grave measure. I strongly believe that governments have to exclude this punishment as it can entail two negative consequences. First of all, a person can wrongly be sentenced and in case of death punishment there is no opportunity to change the decision, and this definitely returns us back to norms which are against the humaneness.
Some
believe that the death sentence should
be applied
for the gravest
offences
. I
totally
disagree with this statement and the following essay will examine the
negative
aspects of this movement.

To
begin
with, the major nuance which detracts from the beneficial
points
of the heavy penalty is the fact that in several cases it is
hard
to be
absolutely
sure for a judge who is guilty. In
other
words, while for
some
situation there are video or audio records where it is obvious that a person committed a crime, for others the evidence of an
offence
is based
on someone's comments or
other
facts, and a person can
wrongly
be assumed
as a criminal. As a case in
point
, in Russia, the capital penalty had been available in the justice system until it
was revealed
that a hundred
people
were
mistakenly
incarcerated and killed.
Thus
, the
government
decided to alter the justice system and exclude this measure at all.

In addition
, another
point
which should
be taken
into consideration when it
comes
to a death sentence is that it is
totally
against the р, and it returns us back to the ancient moral aspects and traditions. To put it
differently
, for several centuries societies shift their emphasis to the actions which can
help
to defend the human rights and maintain a healthy and stable relationship between humans,
so
they reject violence and
other
inappropriate actions. From my
point
of view, capital punishment is a step back to norms and traditions which took place with ancient
people
, and it can
potentially
destroy
our existing
rules
and habits.
As a result
, by accepting this heavy measure
governments
will
probably
modify our attitude regarding humanity
in general
.

In conclusion
, we are all too familiar with the debatable question whether the heavy sentence should exist for serious criminals or it is better to avoid such a grave measure. I
strongly
believe that
governments
have to
exclude this punishment as it can entail two
negative
consequences.
First of all
, a person can
wrongly
be sentenced
and in case of death punishment there is no opportunity to
change
the decision, and this definitely returns us back to norms which are against the humaneness.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The death penalty should be available as a punishment for serious crimes.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
368 words
9
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 9.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 9.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 9.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 9.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts