Some people tend to think that the amount of money that possesses defines how much successful he or she is. This essay was written to counteract this false notion, following with enough reasons to persuade the readers.
That an affluent person is deemed successful does not necessarily compatible with reality. To begin with, some people are lucky enough to be born into wealthy families. Being the family heir, this lucky person will, sooner or later, become the owner of the treasure. As these people have not displayed any perseverance to gain this wealth, considering them as successful people would be hilarious. On the other hand, there are some people who are really successful and make a fortune. Nevertheless, so humble are they that they prefer to donate the wealth to charities or spend on any kind of philanthrophic activities. As a result, judging these people by the number of zeros of their bank accounts is not acceptable.
Money, per se, is not a relevant factor to measure a person's success, as each person might have their definition of success. Having a happy family, for instance, might be something on which a person has set his or her sight. By the same token, a student can interpret success as taking a degree with the highest marks. Considering these two factors, people who debate in favor of a strong correlation between success and wealth may understand that they were on the wrong path.
In conclusion, without awareness of the source of a person's wealth, it is impossible to think of them as successful people. Furthermore, some benevolent people spend the substantial majority of their wealth on charity purposes. Last but not least, success for some individuals is rooted in other factors such as family or credentials rather than money.
Some
people
tend to
think
that the amount of money that possesses defines how much
successful
he or she is. This essay
was written
to counteract this false notion, following with
enough
reasons to persuade the readers.
That an affluent
person
is deemed
successful
does not
necessarily
compatible with reality. To
begin
with,
some
people
are lucky
enough
to
be born
into wealthy
families
. Being the
family
heir, this lucky
person
will, sooner or later, become the owner of the treasure. As these
people
have not displayed any perseverance to gain this
wealth
, considering them as
successful
people
would be hilarious.
On the other hand
, there are
some
people
who are
really
successful
and
make
a fortune.
Nevertheless
,
so
humble are they that they prefer to donate the
wealth
to charities or spend on any kind of
philanthrophic
activities.
As a result
, judging these
people
by the number of zeros of their bank accounts is not acceptable.
Money, per se, is not a relevant factor to measure a person's
success
, as each
person
might have their definition of
success
. Having a happy
family
,
for instance
, might be something on which a
person
has set
his or her
sight. By the same token, a student can interpret
success
as taking a degree with the highest marks. Considering these two factors,
people
who debate in favor of a strong correlation between
success
and
wealth
may understand that they were on the
wrong
path.
In conclusion
, without awareness of the source of a person's
wealth
, it is impossible to
think
of them as
successful
people
.
Furthermore
,
some
benevolent
people
spend the substantial majority of their
wealth
on charity purposes. Last
but
not least,
success
for
some
individuals
is rooted
in other factors such as
family
or credentials
rather
than money.