Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The article states that one of the recently published paintings is attributable to Jane Austen's full-length portrait, whereas before that only existed a rather amateurish sketch of her.

The article states that one of the recently published paintings is attributable to Jane Austen's full-length portrait, whereas before that only existed a rather amateurish sketch of her. DlaNo
The article states that one of the recently published paintings is attributable to Jane Austen's full-length portrait, whereas before that only existed a rather amateurish sketch of her. The lecture, on the other hand, explains that the shreds of evidence provided by the reading is not convincing regarding the validity of the painting and refutes each of the reasons stated by the author. First, the reading explains that the family of Jane Austen has approved of the painting; that is, the subject of the portrait is indeed her. However, the professor refutes this point by mentioning that Jane Austen passed away seventy years ago. Therefore, his currently alive relatives and descendants could not have seen her in person to authorize the painting. Second, the article mentions the resemblance between the authorized sketch and the published full-length painting, that is both of them are depicting the famous novel writer. However, the lecture contends that the subject of both paintings could be one of Jane's relatives. He mentions that the Austen family was a large one, and any of her cousins could look like her. In fact, some are to believe that the subject is one of jane's descendant niece. Third, the reading uses the painter, Ozias Humphry, as the evidence, that is the affluent family of Austen was among those who could afford such an expensive artist. Also, the painting style of the portrait is similar to Humphry's style. The lecturer opposes this point by stating that the method is the only evidence for this limited claim, whereas there are pieces of evidence that the painting could have not to be created in the time that Jane was a teenager. This is because the background canvas was not available in Austen's town by the time she was twenty-seven, and no longer a teenager. So, the painting is, at its best, a few years younger than what the author states.
The article states that one of the recently published
paintings
is attributable to Jane Austen's full-length portrait, whereas
before
that
only
existed a
rather
amateurish sketch of her. The lecture,
on the other hand
,
explains
that the shreds of
evidence
provided by the reading is not convincing regarding the validity of the
painting
and refutes each of the reasons stated by the author.

First
, the reading
explains
that the family of Jane Austen has approved of the
painting
;
that is
, the subject of the portrait is
indeed
her.
However
, the professor refutes this point by mentioning that Jane Austen passed away seventy years ago.
Therefore
, his
currently
alive relatives and descendants could not have
seen
her in person to authorize the painting.

Second, the article mentions the resemblance between the authorized sketch and the published full-length
painting
,
that is
both of them are depicting the
famous
novel writer.
However
, the lecture contends that the subject of both
paintings
could be one of Jane's relatives. He mentions that the Austen family was a large one, and any of her cousins could look like her. In fact,
some
are to believe that the subject is one of
jane
's descendant niece.

Third, the reading
uses
the painter,
Ozias
Humphry
, as the
evidence
,
that is
the affluent family of Austen was among those who could afford such an expensive artist.
Also
, the
painting
style of the portrait is similar to
Humphry
's style. The lecturer opposes this point by stating that the method is the
only
evidence
for this limited claim, whereas there are pieces of
evidence
that the
painting
could have not to
be created
in the time that Jane was a
teenager
. This is
because
the background canvas was not available in Austen's town by the time she was twenty-seven, and no longer a
teenager
.
So
, the
painting
is, at its best, a few years younger than what the author states.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The article states that one of the recently published paintings is attributable to Jane Austen's full-length portrait, whereas before that only existed a rather amateurish sketch of her.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
318 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: