The article states that one dinosaur fossil which recently discovered fortunately has remained complete somehow different parts such aS bone hallow and its inside materials and soft tissue collagen can be detested. The article provide three reason for that. however, the professor has not thought this and he believe that this fossil does not have these materials and other sources should be considered for this material. he opposes each reason stated by the writer.
First, the article avers that the dinosaur’s fossil reveals many small branched channels which is related to hollow bone structure of animal and the materials in these channels are related to red blood cells. In contrast the lecturer opposes this idea by saying that soft tissue which is flexible and sensible cannot remained intact in this long time. he states that they are bacterial organic materials which is remained behind of bacterial colonies activity in this period of time.
Second, the article claims that microscopic examination showed several sphere structure in the animal bone fossil which is connected to red blood cells of T, rex. however, the professor avers that dinosaurs do not have red blood cells, and these red materials probably can be redish materials.
Third, the article brings another evidence to show the importance of this discovery by telling about scientific test which showed this fossil has collagen in its leg bone. On the other hand, the professor refutes this claim by explaining that nobody has found soft protein material such as collagen in much newer fossils. he states that it is so improbable which collagen remained intact for this long period of time and this collagen comes from another resources like researcher skin.
The
article
states that one dinosaur
fossil
which recently discovered
fortunately
has
remained
complete somehow
different
parts such
aS
bone
hallow and its inside
materials
and soft tissue collagen can
be detested
. The
article
provide
three reason for that.
however
, the professor has not
thought
this and
he
believe
that this
fossil
does not have these
materials
and other sources should
be considered
for this
material
.
he
opposes each reason stated by the writer.
First
, the
article
avers that the dinosaur’s
fossil
reveals
many
small
branched channels which
is related
to hollow
bone
structure of animal and the
materials
in these channels
are related
to
red
blood cells. In
contrast
the lecturer opposes this
idea
by saying that soft tissue which is flexible and sensible cannot
remained
intact in this long time.
he
states that they are bacterial organic
materials
which is
remained
behind of bacterial
colonies
activity in this period of time.
Second, the
article
claims that microscopic examination
showed
several sphere structure in the animal
bone
fossil
which
is connected
to
red
blood cells of T,
rex
.
however
, the professor avers that dinosaurs do not have
red
blood cells, and these
red
materials
probably
can be
redish
materials.
Third, the
article
brings another evidence to
show
the importance of this discovery by telling about scientific
test
which
showed
this
fossil
has collagen in its leg
bone
.
On the other hand
, the professor refutes this claim by explaining that nobody has found soft protein
material
such as collagen in much newer
fossils
.
he
states that it is
so
improbable which collagen
remained
intact for this long period of time and this collagen
comes
from another resources like researcher skin.