Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

tpo 07

tpo 07 9LYxw
Both the article and the lecture talk about the new ecological sustainable foresty approach and its effect on the U. S. wood companies. The article states that this eco-certification won't affects the U. S. wood companies and U. S. people. It procides three reasons of support. On the other hand, the professor does not believe so and refuts all the autho'reasons. First, the article avers that people in U. S. faced a lot of adverrtisment and then folks won't pay much attention to them. Because many usuall companies' product included " new" or 'improved" label people will not get them serious. It will happen for the eco-certification wood goods. However, the professor rebuts this idea by mentioning that people distinguish the difference between a lable from the company and one from a third unbiased company with an international reputation. Hence, this eco-certified label can convince them to buy those products. Second, the article asserts that having this certifaication will increase the cost of the wood and logically niether companies nor coustomers want to tolerate this expences. It concludes that this more expencive wood products won't be successful in sell. Conversely, the professor avers that a research showed that if this price difference between th eco friendly wood and usual wood products is less than five percent as it is for the eco-certified wood products, people will pay for that willingly because they take care about the envvironment. Third, the reading claims that American companies which won't sell their products abroad, do not need to take these validation to compete with European wood companies, since U. S. people are their coustomers and they buy those products. Controversially, the lecturer believe that it is not about the competition across the board, it is need to take these certification to be able to compete with European companies in the U. S. market, where American companies should compete with European to take advantage of the U. S. market.
Both the
article
and the lecture talk about the new ecological sustainable
foresty
approach and its effect on the U. S.
wood
companies
. The
article
states that this
eco-certification
won't
affects
the U. S.
wood
companies
and U. S.
people
. It
procides
three reasons of support.
On the other hand
, the professor does not believe
so
and
refuts
all the
autho
'reasons.

First
, the
article
avers that
people
in U. S. faced
a lot of
adverrtisment
and then folks won't pay much attention to them.
Because
many
usuall
companies
'
product
included
&quot
;
new&quot
; or '
improved&quot
; label
people
will not
get
them serious. It will happen for the
eco-certification
wood
goods
.
However
, the professor rebuts this
idea
by mentioning that
people
distinguish the difference between a
lable
from the
company
and one from a third unbiased
company
with an international reputation.
Hence
, this
eco-certified
label can convince them to
buy
those products.

Second, the
article
asserts that having this
certifaication
will increase the cost of the
wood
and
logically
niether
companies
nor
coustomers
want to tolerate this
expences
. It concludes that this more
expencive
wood
products
won't be successful in sell.
Conversely
, the professor avers that
a research
showed
that if this price difference between
th
eco friendly
wood
and usual
wood
products
is less than five percent as it is for the
eco-certified
wood
products
,
people
will pay for that
willingly
because
they take care about the
envvironment
.

Third, the reading claims that American
companies
which won't sell their
products
abroad, do not need to take
these validation
to compete with European
wood
companies
, since U. S.
people
are their
coustomers and
they
buy
those
products
.
Controversially
, the lecturer believe that it is not about the competition across the board, it
is need
to take
these certification
to be able to compete with European
companies
in the U. S. market, where American
companies
should compete with European to take advantage of the U. S. market.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay tpo 07

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
324 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: