Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The article declares that in the twentieth-century archaeologists suffer serious problems and limitations to find a history of human settlement in Britain and provides three reasons for that.

The article declares that in the twentieth-century archaeologists suffer serious problems and limitations to find a history of human settlement in Britain and provides three reasons for that. 9LYOw
The article declares that in the twentieth-century archaeologists suffer serious problems and limitations to find a history of human settlement in Britain and provides three reasons for that. However, the professor explains that in 1990 Britain adopted new rules which helped in all three areas which article discusses and refutes each of the author's reasons. To begin with, the reading states that due to construction many important artifacts were destroyed. On the other hand, the lecturer contradicts this points by stating that according to new guideline before construction start site has to examine first by the archaeologists and if is valuable for them then they have to find other options like they can do construction around that area or archaeologists have to excavate the whole site first and after that construction start. Moreover, the reading claims that the government not providing enough financial support for archaeological research. Nonetheless, the speaker says that if they find valuable artifacts site then the construction company had to pay for an initial examination so there is more financial support than before. Lastly, the passage contends that to have a career in archaeology is very difficult. The professor cast doubt on this theory. He points out that the government hire paid archaeologists to do work. And many of them needed different stages during the excavating process like draw proper plans, process all collected data, etc. So many jobs are generated and many opportunities available for archaeologists.
The article declares that in the twentieth-century
archaeologists
suffer serious problems and limitations to find a history of human settlement in Britain and provides three reasons for that.
However
, the professor
explains
that in 1990 Britain adopted new
rules
which
helped
in all three areas which article discusses and refutes each of the author's reasons.

To
begin
with, the reading states that due to
construction
many
important
artifacts were
destroyed
.
On the other hand
, the lecturer contradicts this points by stating that according to new guideline
before
construction
start
site
has to
examine
first
by the
archaeologists
and if is valuable for them then they
have to
find other options like they can do
construction
around that area or
archaeologists
have to
excavate the whole site
first
and after that
construction
start
.

Moreover
, the reading claims that the
government
not providing
enough
financial support for archaeological research. Nonetheless, the speaker says that if they find valuable artifacts site then the
construction
company
had to pay for an initial examination
so
there is more financial support than
before
.

Lastly
, the passage contends that to have a career in archaeology is
very
difficult. The professor cast doubt on this theory. He points out that the
government
hire paid
archaeologists
to do work. And
many
of them needed
different
stages during the excavating process like draw proper plans, process all collected data, etc.
So
many
jobs
are generated
and
many
opportunities available for
archaeologists
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The article declares that in the twentieth-century archaeologists suffer serious problems and limitations to find a history of human settlement in Britain and provides three reasons for that.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
241 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: