In this present world, the usage of computers is constantly on the rise. Even formal education centres are among the many places that enjoy the usage and benefits of digitalisation. It is disagreed that human teachers will be totally substituted for technology. Analysing the incapability of disciplining students with robots, as well as the limitation in the learning process of students taught with programmed bots will prove this.
Firstly, a robotic teacher made with artificial intelligence would lack sufficient control over its disciples. For instance, it is widely known that kids need to be thoroughly watched by their teachers to be sure that they take their class works seriously and do not fool around when classes are going on. Sadly, this is a task robotic teachers will be incapable of carrying out. Therefore, this makes it clear that faculty will never be totally substituted for technology.
Secondly, the learning process of students would be disrupted if they are taught by robotic teachers, which may slow down some students’ ability to comprehend information taught in lessons. For example, kids love to be motivated before lessons are taught effectively. This is a quality that many human teachers have but robotic teachers do not have. Thus, it becomes apparent that human mentors will never be replaced with robotic coaches.
To summarise, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of imparting formal education completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over rules-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.
In this present world, the usage of computers is
constantly
on the rise. Even formal education
centres
are among the
many
places that enjoy the usage and benefits of
digitalisation
. It
is disagreed
that human
teachers
will be
totally
substituted for technology.
Analysing
the incapability of disciplining
students
with robots,
as well
as the limitation in the learning process of
students
taught with programmed bots will prove this.
Firstly
, a
robotic
teacher
made with artificial intelligence would lack sufficient control over its disciples.
For instance
, it is
widely
known that kids need to be
thoroughly
watched
by their
teachers
to be sure that they take their
class
works
seriously
and do not fool around when classes are going on.
Sadly
, this is a task
robotic
teachers
will be incapable of carrying out.
Therefore
, this
makes
it
clear
that faculty will never be
totally
substituted for technology.
Secondly
, the learning process of
students
would
be disrupted
if they
are taught
by
robotic
teachers
, which may slow down
some
students’
ability to comprehend information taught in lessons.
For example
, kids
love
to
be motivated
before
lessons
are taught
effectively
. This is a quality that
many
human
teachers
have
but
robotic
teachers
do not have.
Thus
, it becomes apparent that human mentors will never
be replaced
with
robotic
coaches.
To
summarise
, a
robotic
teacher
does not have the necessary disciple to
properly
give instructions to
students
and actually works to retard the ability of a
student
to comprehend new lessons.
Therefore
, it is
clear
that the
idea
of imparting formal education completely by a machine cannot
be supported
. After thorough analysis on this subject, it
is predicted
that the adverse effects of the debate over
rules
-driven teaching will always be greater than the
positive
effects, and
because of this
, classroom
teachers
will never
be substituted
for technology.