The reading and the lecturer are both about the sigarette smokers should pay high taxes. The lecturer cast doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
Firstly, according to the reading taxes will discourage people for idulging unhealthy behaviors. However, the lecturer disputes this points. She says that this approach does not led to healthy behave. If the price of cigaret increase that would led people to pay the cheaper one which is much ricky and harmful to the health.
Secnodly, the article contends that taxes for this kind is fair because they wil cost as they need medical care. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this arguments. She argues that the consequence of smoking made the government rise the taxs, is unfair for people as they think. If high earn person and low earn person addicted to the cigaret, taxs would become expensive for the low income person than the high income person which makes it a burden.
Finally, the reading claims that taxes will increase the revenue for the government and they will use it on medical assistance as well as for others projocts. The lecturer, on the other hand, believe that gevornment earn a millions of money and do not want to loss them. So that it wil allow smoking in the parks and the privat area as well due to the fact that they did not loss they income from this situation.
The
reading
and the
lecturer
are both about the
sigarette
smokers should pay high
taxes
. The
lecturer
cast doubt on the main points made in the
reading
by providing three reasons.
Firstly
, according to the
reading
taxes
will discourage
people
for
idulging
unhealthy behaviors.
However
, the
lecturer
disputes this points. She says that this approach does not
led
to healthy behave. If the price of
cigaret
increase that would
led
people
to pay the cheaper one which is much
ricky
and harmful to the health.
Secnodly
, the article contends that
taxes
for this kind is
fair
because
they
wil
cost as they need medical care.
Nevertheless
, the
lecturer
refutes
this
arguments. She argues that the consequence of smoking made the
government
rise the
taxs
, is unfair for
people
as they
think
. If high earn
person
and low earn
person
addicted to the
cigaret
,
taxs
would become expensive for the low income
person
than the high income
person
which
makes
it a burden.
Finally
, the
reading
claims that
taxes
will increase the revenue for the
government and
they will
use
it on medical assistance
as well
as for others
projocts
. The
lecturer
,
on the other hand
,
believe
that
gevornment
earn
a millions
of money and do not want to loss them.
So
that it
wil
allow
smoking in the parks and the
privat
area
as well
due to the fact that they did not loss
they income
from this situation.