The reading states that human-made reefs can be used as a protective object to save fish from hazards threatening them and provides three reasons to claim this idea; Nevertheless, the professor disagrees with this and refutes each of the points made in the passage.
To begin with, the author mentions that fishers can use artificial reefs to help them compete with larger firms and earn their living. The lecturer challenges this specific point. He believes that the reefs population is not in danger, and the high rate of catching fish is due to the high number of their population. Moreover, he adds that reefs attract fish to the area, and the more fish are available, the greater their species will be subjected to extinction.
Secondly, while the passage asserts that companies can exploit precious minerals from asteroids and sell them to build hand-made reefs, the lecturer has a different perspective. He claims that putting reefs in hidden places will cause security issues. There is a possibility that the net will attach to the reefs and get ripped off, or the boats crash into reefs while they are in shallow water.
Finally, according to the text, creating reefs is environmentally beneficial and reduces trash from the circumstance. The professor opposes this argument, explaining that artificial reefs have chief environmental pollution. For instance, he says that Azborn reefs that were made of used tires had unstoppable effects on the area. Additionally, he points out that they were bound together underwater, but it spread all tires in the ocean and affected many marine animals when a tornado happened.
The reading states that human-made
reefs
can be
used
as a protective object to save fish from hazards threatening them and provides three reasons to claim this
idea
;
Nevertheless
, the professor disagrees with this and refutes each of the points made in the passage.
To
begin
with, the author mentions that fishers can
use
artificial
reefs
to
help
them compete with larger firms and earn their living. The lecturer challenges this specific point. He believes that the
reefs
population is not in
danger
, and the high rate of catching fish is due to the high number of their population.
Moreover
, he
adds
that
reefs
attract fish to the area, and the more fish are available, the greater their species will
be subjected
to extinction.
Secondly
, while the passage asserts that
companies
can exploit precious minerals from asteroids and sell them to build hand-made
reefs
, the lecturer has a
different
perspective. He claims that putting
reefs
in hidden places will cause security issues. There is a possibility that the net will attach to the
reefs
and
get
ripped off, or the boats crash into
reefs
while they are in shallow water.
Finally
, according to the text, creating
reefs
is
environmentally
beneficial and
reduces
trash from the circumstance. The professor opposes this argument, explaining that artificial
reefs
have chief environmental pollution.
For instance
, he says that
Azborn
reefs
that
were made
of
used
tires had unstoppable effects on the area.
Additionally
, he points out that they
were bound
together underwater,
but
it spread all tires in the ocean and
affected
many
marine animals when a tornado happened.