Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

summarize two different point of view about fossil of nests that are found recently.

summarize two different point of view about fossil of nests that are found recently. 9lLpX

The reading asserts that nests that were found in fossil remnants are not related to bees, and they are related to other animals but not bees; nevertheless, the lecturer believes that it is possible nests belonges to bees and refutes each of the points in the reading. To begin with, the author mentions that there are no fossil record of bees dating to 200 million years ago to support that bees made the discovered nests. This specific argument is challenged by the professor. He says that there is no fossil record of bees because the condition was not favorable to protect bees' bodies from decomposition. Additionally, he states that bees' bodies can survive in a sticky liquid called Razon that is produced by specific kinds of trees. Since the tree was not developed 200 million years ago, it is possible that the bees existed but their bodies did not preserved through time. Second, the passage argues that bee and flowers have a mutual connection and bees feed on flowering plants. It adds since there were no such plants back then, so bees were not living before flowering plants' spread. However, the professor disagrees with this claim and expresses that it is possible that bees lived on non-flowering plants before the scatter of flowering flora. He explains that there is a great chance that bees lived without flowering plants and after their spread, bees got adopted to them and this relationship stayed stable since then. According to the text, there are differences between modern bee nests and the one's that scientists found. Thus, the nests were not made by bees. The lecturer opposes this idea, stating that the fossil nests lack chamber, but they have other similarities with modern nests of bees. For example, modern bees use a specific chemical matter which is water proof to build their nests. Chemical analysis from fossils show that these nests were made from the same water proof chemical. Therefore, the lecturer bieleves that there are enough evidence to prove that these nests belonged to bees and not other animals.

The reading asserts that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
 that were found
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 remnants are not related to bees, and they are related
 to other animals This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 not bees; nevertheless
, the lecturer believes that it is possible You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
Possible spelling mistake found.belongedbelongsbelong es
belonges
 to bees and refutes each of the points in the reading.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, the author mentions that there are no You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 record of bees dating to 200 million years ago to support that bees made the discovered You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
. This specific argument is challenged
 by the professor. He says that there is no You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
 record of bees This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the condition was not favorable to protect bees' bodies from decomposition. Additionally
, he states that bees' bodies can survive in a sticky liquid called Possible spelling mistake found.RazorRamonRadonRayonRamón
Razon
 that is produced
 by specific kinds of trees. Since the tree was not developed 200 million years ago, it is possible that the bees existed This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 their bodies did not The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: "preserve"preserve
preserved
 through time.

Second, the passage argues that bee and flowers have a mutual connection and bees feed on flowering You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
. It This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accrues
adds
 since there were no such You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 back then, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 bees were not living This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 flowering plants' spread. However
, the professor disagrees with this claim and expresses that it is possible that bees This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resided
lived
 on non-flowering You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 the Use "(scatter)" if you mean to express an extreme with this adjective.(scatter)
scatter
 of flowering flora. He This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :interprets
explains
 that there is a great chance that bees This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resided
lived
 without flowering You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 and after their spread, bees This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquired
got
 adopted to them and this relationship stayed stable since then.

According to the text, there are differences between modern bee You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
 and the one's that scientists found. Thus
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
 were not made by bees. The lecturer opposes this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
, stating that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
 lack chamber, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 they have other similarities with modern You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
 of bees. For example
, modern bees This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 a specific chemical matter which is This word is normally spelled as one.waterproof
water proof
 to build their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
. Chemical analysis from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withspecimenrelicskeletontrace
fossils
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstrateportrayindicatedisplay
show
 that these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
were made
 from the same This word is normally spelled as one.waterproof
water proof
 chemical. Therefore
, the lecturer Possible spelling mistake found.bailees
bieleves
 that there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
enough
 evidence to prove that these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withburrowrefugeden
nests
 belonged to bees and not other animals. 