The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to human presence on Mars and the moon would be impossible due to bad conditions and provides three reasons for support. Nevertheless, the professor explains that establishing a human station in certainly possible and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading passage posits that higher atmospheric pressure makes difficult to survive at Venus. In contrast, the professor points out that developing a balloon station helps. He states that balloon station kept 50km above the Venus surface and as the pressure is lower at the higher surface it helps to make equal pressure like earth, so human lives can survive easily. Clearly, a disparity exists between the article and evidence exhibited by the professor,
Second, the reading article pushes forth the idea that the absence of water reservoirs causes difficult for human living. Regardless, according to the professor venus atmosphere has carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, which are helpful to develop oxygen which eventually led to producing water. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in the reading is unsubstantiated.
Finally, the article claims that sunlight is an issue for human living. However, the professor refutes the point by explaining that the Venus clouds are very thin so some sunlight can be pass through the clouds and also a reflection on clouds helps to reach sunlight to the Venus surface. And he also mentions that developing a solar panel helps to collect solar power, which is enough to generate electricity need to run a power station.
In summary, while both the reading and the classroom discussion provides interesting information regarding the inhospitable environment of Venus, significant support found to the opposite because of all the reasons mentioned above. Therefore, we can assume that reading fails to justify the claim.
The
article
discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to
human
presence on Mars and the moon would be impossible due to
bad
conditions and provides three reasons for support.
Nevertheless
, the
professor
explains
that establishing a
human
station in
certainly
possible and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First
, the
reading
passage posits that higher atmospheric pressure
makes
difficult to survive at
Venus
.
In contrast
, the
professor
points out that developing a balloon station
helps
. He states that balloon station
kept
50km
above the
Venus
surface and as the pressure is lower at the higher surface it
helps
to
make
equal pressure like earth,
so
human
lives
can survive
easily
.
Clearly
, a disparity exists between the
article
and evidence exhibited by the professor,
Second, the
reading
article
pushes forth the
idea
that the absence of water reservoirs causes difficult for
human
living. Regardless, according to the
professor
venus
atmosphere has carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, which are helpful to develop oxygen which
eventually
led to producing water.
Consequently
, we can argue that
indeed
the claim made in the
reading
is unsubstantiated
.
Finally
, the
article
claims that sunlight is an issue for
human
living.
However
, the
professor
refutes the point by explaining that the
Venus
clouds are
very
thin
so
some
sunlight can be pass through the clouds and
also
a reflection on clouds
helps
to reach sunlight to the
Venus
surface. And he
also
mentions that developing a solar panel
helps
to collect solar power, which is
enough
to generate electricity need to run a power station.
In summary, while both the
reading
and the classroom discussion provides interesting information regarding the inhospitable environment of
Venus
, significant support found to the opposite
because
of all the reasons mentioned above.
Therefore
, we can assume that
reading
fails to justify the claim.