When the topic of freedom of children's behavior is discussed there are split opinions regarding it. Several guardians and tutors reckon that it is better to head children's etiquette while other group of thinkers support that children should live with freedom of behavior. However, both has its own pros and cons. Therefore, before commenting on my opinion both the view would be discussed in the ensuring paragraphs.
Examining the former view, the primary argument the supporters would like to put forward is keeping the family values maintained and continuing to the next generation. By this i mean that when the family's private as well as social behaviors are taught to the children they grow up with good manners. In addition, they also believe that when tutors and parents control children behavior, they become dependent on guardians for every little things and even for small decisions. Apart from that the higher interference of adults into children's behavior makes yhem irksome and exasperated by their parents and mentors.
On the contrary, the proponents of latter view claim that freedom of behavior of children is an appropriate way to deal with this situation. This means that when children are provided with particularl behavioral independence they mostly grow up as bad mannerd and blunt. Furthermore, they also become more carefree about restrictions and do what they want which paves a way to the bad decisions of their life. Along with this as they are not bound with mentors they lose family values and make their future perilous. In the absence of adults control over one's behavior the person's life gets more and more formidable.
To conclude, the benefits of guardians control on behavior of children surpasses the negative effects of freedom on children's behavior. Therefore in my opinion children should mandatorily kept under control of certain behavior by parents and tutors in order to rise a gentleman or gentle lady while those given freedom of behavior eventually forgets family values and becomes blunt person.
When
the topic of
freedom
of
children's
behavior
is discussed
there
are split
opinions regarding it. Several guardians and tutors reckon that it is better to head
children's
etiquette while other group of thinkers support that
children
should
live
with
freedom
of
behavior
.
However
, both has its
own
pros and cons.
Therefore
,
before
commenting on my opinion both the view would
be discussed
in the ensuring paragraphs.
Examining the former view, the primary argument the supporters would like to put forward is keeping the family values maintained and continuing to the
next
generation. By this
i
mean that when the family's private
as well
as social
behaviors
are taught
to the
children
they grow up with
good
manners.
In addition
, they
also
believe that when tutors and parents
control
children
behavior
, they become dependent on guardians for every
little
things and even for
small
decisions. Apart from that the higher interference of adults into
children's
behavior
makes
yhem
irksome and exasperated by their parents and mentors.
On the contrary
, the proponents of latter view claim that
freedom
of
behavior
of
children
is an appropriate way to deal with this situation. This means that when
children
are provided
with
particularl
behavioral independence they
mostly
grow up as
bad
mannerd
and blunt.
Furthermore
, they
also
become more carefree about restrictions and do what they want which paves a way to the
bad
decisions of their life. Along with this as they are not bound with mentors they lose family values and
make
their future perilous. In the absence of adults
control
over one's
behavior
the person's life
gets
more and more formidable.
To conclude
, the benefits of guardians
control
on
behavior
of
children
surpasses the
negative
effects of
freedom
on
children's
behavior
.
Therefore
in my opinion
children
should
mandatorily
kept
under
control
of certain
behavior
by parents and tutors in order to rise a gentleman or gentle lady while those
given
freedom
of
behavior
eventually
forgets family values and becomes blunt person.