It is debatable whether or not the future generations of country should be motivated from their families for being active members of their living communities. Several arguments for and against the topic. This essay analyses both the views and will reach into a logical conclusion.
The proponents who supports the assistance of the parents for their childrens communal activities on their free time believe that the younger one's are not aware about the need of social gathering and the happiness one can enjoy by completing a task with the help of their colleagues. They are also in a viewpoint that the children tends to imitate mostly their parents and their guidance for taking part in any social activities will definitely aids their interest on the necessity of the doing things collectively rather than doing it individually. In their analysis, this motivation from the biological parents is highly needed for the children to thrive on physical and mental abilities. They believe that although it is time consuming for the parents to asssist their younger one's for being a part of the social work but it will definitely change the overall character of the child.
The people who are supporting the natural evolution of the children character believe that the adults should not enforce the younger one's to develop their social skills. They are in a belief that the various stages of character development of the children is quite natural and they do not need any support from their parents to be a model on the sociaety. In their viewpoint, children will automatically understand the need for being social through their life experiences. They believe that the future generation mastering life skills by their
own experiences rather than being told by parents came to know deeply about the need for helping someone and the social values. For example, a children on his younger
ages do not know about the value of giving a burger to a homeless person lying on the street because they did not deal with the hunger in their family.
In a nut shell, both the sides have several points that are for and against the topic but i believe that the future generations of a nation should be taught from their houses to take part
in the various activities on our neighbourhoods because it will help them to dramatically improve their life skills in a better way.
It is debatable
whether or not
the future generations of country should
be motivated
from their families for being active members of their living communities. Several arguments for and against the topic. This essay analyses both the views and will reach into a logical conclusion.
The proponents who
supports
the assistance of the
parents
for their
childrens
communal activities on their free time
believe
that the younger
one's
are not aware about the
need
of
social
gathering and the happiness one can enjoy by completing a task with the
help
of their colleagues. They are
also
in a viewpoint that the
children
tends to imitate
mostly
their
parents
and their guidance for taking part in any
social
activities will definitely aids their interest on the necessity of the doing things
collectively
rather
than doing it
individually
. In their analysis, this motivation from the biological
parents
is
highly
needed for the
children
to thrive on physical and mental abilities. They
believe
that although it is
time consuming
for the
parents
to
asssist
their younger one's for being a part of the
social
work
but
it will definitely
change
the
overall
character of the child.
The
people
who are supporting the natural evolution of the
children
character
believe
that the adults should not enforce the younger one's to develop their
social
skills
. They are in a belief that the various stages of character development of the
children
is quite
natural and
they do not
need
any support from their
parents
to be a model on the
sociaety
. In their viewpoint,
children
will
automatically
understand the
need
for being
social
through their life experiences. They
believe
that the future generation mastering life
skills
by their
own
experiences
rather
than being
told
by
parents
came to know
deeply
about the
need
for helping someone and the
social
values.
For example
, a
children
on his younger
ages do not know about the value of giving a burger to a homeless person lying on the street
because
they did not deal with the hunger in their family.
In a nut shell, both the sides have several points that are for and against the topic
but
i
believe
that the future generations of a nation should
be taught
from their
houses
to
take part
in the various activities on our
neighbourhoods
because
it will
help
them to
dramatically
improve
their life
skills
in a better way.