Prison life can improve an inmate's character and make him or her become transmitters of good ideas to the next generation. Therefore, some people consider that students can learn from ex-prisoner mistakes to improve their perception of committing a crime. From my perspective, I completely agree that former convicts are able to contribute to moral education.
Firstly, allowing such people to speak to teenagers about their experiences is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law. While in prison, character education courses changed people, making them feel guilty for committing crimes, so they have enough life experience to tell undergraduates about how they became involved in crime, the dangers of a criminal lifestyle, and what life in prison is really like. Moreover, reformed offenders can prevent students who are intending to infringe upon the law. Adolescents often trust what they know more than guidance from their parents because of impulsivity. For that reason, the preaching from an ethical criminal is a good way to raise their awareness.
People who have been convicted of a crime would also benefit from this system. They would feel better if they shared their stories, and it would be a terrific method for these folks to keep away from crime. They would also feel more connected to society and grateful for being able to contribute to it. Allowing teachers to educate children is another method of educating young people about the dangers of committing a crime. However, in my opinion, this is ineffective since students will approach these as class lectures rather than real-life stories to be carefully listened to. Students can be educated through stories and films, but they are not as involved as sessions with ex-offenders.
To summarize, we should educate our young generation about the consequences of committing crimes, and I feel they would learn this better from reformed convicts who speak from their experience.
Prison life can
improve
an inmate's character and
make
him or her become transmitters of
good
ideas
to the
next
generation.
Therefore
,
some
people
consider that
students
can learn from ex-prisoner mistakes to
improve
their perception of
committing
a
crime
. From my perspective, I completely
agree
that former convicts are able to contribute to moral education.
Firstly
, allowing such
people
to speak to
teenagers
about their experiences is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law. While in prison, character education courses
changed
people
, making them
feel
guilty for
committing
crimes
,
so
they have
enough
life experience to
tell
undergraduates about how they became involved in
crime
, the
dangers
of a criminal lifestyle, and what life in prison is
really
like.
Moreover
, reformed offenders can
prevent
students
who are intending to infringe upon the law. Adolescents
often
trust what they know more than guidance from their parents
because
of impulsivity. For that reason, the preaching from an ethical criminal is a
good
way to raise their awareness.
People
who have
been convicted
of a
crime
would
also
benefit from this system. They would
feel
better if they shared their stories, and it would be a terrific method for these folks to
keep
away from
crime
. They would
also
feel
more connected to society and grateful for being able to contribute to it. Allowing teachers to educate children is another method of educating young
people
about the
dangers
of
committing
a
crime
.
However
, in my opinion, this is ineffective since
students
will approach these as
class
lectures
rather
than real-life stories to be
carefully
listened to.
Students
can
be educated
through stories and films,
but
they are not as involved as sessions with ex-offenders.
To summarize
, we should educate our young generation about the consequences of
committing
crimes
, and I
feel
they would learn this better from reformed convicts who speak from their experience.