In recent years, choosing a leadership position in a company or an organization is extremely important. In my opinion, the younger people who are suitable for applying for leadership positions.
The argument in favour of appointing older leaders would be that they accumulated considerable specialized knowledge and practical experience through years of working, they can make better decisions, which means that the experience of older leaders can be a crucial element that helps them maintain the growth of the company or an organization. However, this might be a shortsighted view. Although younger leaders have less experience than old leaders, they are more conducive to access new knowledge which helps them outperform old leaders. Therefore, the CEO of companies should appoint younger individuals for positions that demand leadership skills for their updated knowledge.
Younger leaders would be the best choice for most companies as they are stronger and creativity. Since the younger people will have creative ideas and innovative perspectives, which were often lacking in older leaders, could significantly contribute to the development of the company, especially in some cases being of vital importance. For example, Steve Jobs took Apple from near bankruptcy to the world’s most admired tech company by his brilliant designs when he was still very young. Moreover, younger leaders are physically stronger, so they could shoulder great responsibility and withstand the pressure can come from heavy workload better than old ones. With stiffer competition, leaders have to under intense pressure from their work and the ability of elderly leaders will be limited due to health-related problems.
In conclusion, leadership positions should be given to younger people.
In recent years, choosing a
leadership
position in a
company
or an organization is
extremely
important
. In my opinion, the
younger
people
who are suitable for applying for
leadership
positions.
The argument in
favour
of appointing older
leaders
would be that they accumulated considerable specialized knowledge and practical experience through years of working, they can
make
better decisions, which means that the experience of older
leaders
can be a crucial element that
helps
them maintain the growth of the
company
or an organization.
However
, this might be a shortsighted view. Although
younger
leaders
have less experience than
old
leaders
, they are more conducive to access new knowledge which
helps
them outperform
old
leaders
.
Therefore
, the CEO of
companies
should appoint
younger
individuals for positions that demand
leadership
skills
for their updated knowledge.
Younger
leaders
would be the best choice for most
companies
as they are stronger and creativity. Since the
younger
people
will have creative
ideas
and innovative perspectives, which were
often
lacking in older
leaders
, could
significantly
contribute to the development of the
company
,
especially
in
some
cases being of vital importance.
For example
, Steve Jobs took Apple from near bankruptcy to the world’s most admired tech
company
by his brilliant designs when he was
still
very
young.
Moreover
,
younger
leaders
are
physically
stronger,
so
they could shoulder great responsibility and withstand the pressure can
come
from heavy workload better than
old
ones. With stiffer competition,
leaders
have to
under intense pressure from their work and the ability of elderly
leaders
will
be limited
due to health-related problems.
In conclusion
,
leadership
positions should be
given
to
younger
people
.