There is no doubt that there is a wide range of salaries in some nations nowadays. While some people believe that extremely high remunerations are in favour of a nation, others argue that this trend does more harm than good and hence the government should put a cap on how much one can earn. In this essay I will discuss both sides of the argument (write: the argument) and lend my support for the latter view.
Those who believe that high salary packages are good for a country might support it for various reasons. Firstly, higher salaries would bring a better lifestyle to the country. This is because the money always circulates within the country and keeps changing hands. The more the money in circulation, the more the prosperity. Secondly, they might also argue that a high salary means a better job. For example, the traders in investment banks are the people who make millions of dollars every year and undoubtedly trading is one of the most attractive professions.
On the other hand, I would argue that the free upward movement of salaries should be checked and controlled by the government because of the intense competition it creates along with the huge disparity of incomes in a society. Competitiveness beyond a certain point can make human life awful. This is because people get into the rat race and compare them with others rather than enjoying what they already have. Ultimately, this mentality results in stress and tension. Also, the wide range of income difference can lead to criminal activities. This is due to the fact that poor people would find it extremely difficult to earn higher salaries through legal means, and might get tempted into traps of easy money.
To conclude, although the very high salaries may benefit a certain section of the society, it leads to unhealthy competition and a spurt in criminal activities. Therefore, in my opinion, the advantages of this phenomenon are outweighed by the disadvantages and it is the responsibility of the government to check it.
There is no doubt that there is a wide range of
salaries
in
some
nations nowadays. While
some
people
believe that
extremely
high
remunerations are in
favour
of a nation, others argue that this trend does more harm than
good
and
hence
the
government
should put a cap on how much one can earn. In this essay I will discuss both sides of the argument (write: the argument) and lend my support for the latter view.
Those who believe that
high
salary
packages are
good
for a country might support it for various reasons.
Firstly
, higher
salaries
would bring a better lifestyle to the country. This is
because
the money always circulates within the country and
keeps
changing hands. The more the money in circulation, the more the prosperity.
Secondly
, they might
also
argue that a
high
salary
means a better job.
For example
, the traders in investment banks are the
people
who
make
millions of dollars every year and
undoubtedly
trading is one of the most attractive professions.
On the other hand
, I would argue that the free upward movement of
salaries
should be
checked
and controlled by the
government
because
of the intense competition it creates along with the huge disparity of incomes in a society. Competitiveness beyond a certain point can
make
human life awful. This is
because
people
get
into the rat race and compare them with others
rather
than enjoying what they already have.
Ultimately
, this mentality results in
stress
and tension.
Also
, the wide range of income difference can lead to criminal activities.
This is due to the fact that
poor
people
would find it
extremely
difficult to earn higher
salaries
through legal means, and might
get
tempted into traps of easy money.
To conclude
, although the
very
high
salaries
may benefit a certain section of the society, it leads to unhealthy competition and a spurt in criminal activities.
Therefore
, in my opinion, the advantages of this phenomenon
are outweighed
by the disadvantages and it is the responsibility of the
government
to
check
it.