There are conflicting arguments regarding that whether whether digital books would replace physical books. In this essay, both sides of the argument will be discussed and followed my perspective to this matter.
On one hand, digital books are appealing for working and academy with its portability and enormous storage. Especially, to administrative people immersed with huge amount of paperwork and documents, such advantage enables them to work remotely and flexibly without carrying heavy bookcases. Even if there is a miss out of typical documents, copies can sent by cyber sharing or airdrop. To students, digital books are welcoming servants that can collect and compact all leaning resources into a tablet, encouraging students to impose preview and after-reading to gain advanced academic achievements in a more efficient way.
On the other hand, physical books have more power in low start-up cost and function of ornaments. Distinguished from digital books require devices to read, the cost of physical books is the books. So, they are economical and tend to be the initial choice of finical struggling people. In addition, physical books are more tangible and regarded as decorations in loads of interior design proposal because their presence on bookshelf could reflects house owner’s knowledge and background. Also they are economical and the savings can be retained for other budgets.
From my perspective, the preference of reading either digital books or physical books should depends on individual disposable income and health condition. It is reasonable that people with highly competitive income and can afford an expensive technical device to purchase digital books for their convenience. Also, for people who concern about eye sight and have hesitate attitude to blue ray, physical books are good options.
In conclusion, reading is an therapeutic activity for relaxing and learning. The decisive factor laid there is personal demand rather than books’ carrier.
There are conflicting arguments regarding that
whether whether
digital
books
would replace
physical
books
. In this essay, both sides of the argument will
be discussed
and followed my perspective to this matter.
On one hand, digital
books
are appealing for working and academy with its portability and enormous storage.
Especially
, to administrative
people
immersed with huge amount of paperwork and documents, such advantage enables them to work
remotely
and
flexibly
without carrying heavy bookcases. Even if there is a miss out of typical documents, copies can
sent
by cyber sharing or airdrop. To students, digital
books
are welcoming servants that can collect and compact all leaning resources into a tablet, encouraging students to impose preview and after-reading to gain advanced academic achievements in a more efficient way.
On the other hand
,
physical
books
have more power in low
start
-up cost and function of ornaments. Distinguished from digital
books
require devices to read, the cost of
physical
books
is the
books
.
So
, they are economical and tend to be the initial choice of finical struggling
people
.
In addition
,
physical
books
are more tangible and regarded as decorations in loads of interior design proposal
because
their presence on bookshelf could
reflects
house
owner’s knowledge and background.
Also
they are economical and the savings can
be retained
for other budgets.
From my perspective, the preference of reading either digital
books
or
physical
books
should
depends
on individual disposable income and health condition. It is reasonable that
people
with
highly
competitive income and can afford an expensive technical device to
purchase
digital
books
for their convenience.
Also
, for
people
who concern about
eye sight
and have
hesitate
attitude to blue ray,
physical
books
are
good
options.
In conclusion
, reading is
an
therapeutic activity for relaxing and learning. The decisive factor laid there is personal demand
rather
than
books’
carrier.