Animals play an important role in the ecosystem. Society is in a dilemma as to whether zoos should be banned for being cruel to living creatures or whether they help save rare animals. Different people have different mindsets. However, both have their own advantages and disadvantages. The next paragraph will clarify both approaches before commenting on my decision, starting with the first idea that a zoo can be closed permanently because it is cruel, there are numerous things to share in its favor. The first and foremost is to lose the freedom of animals. As a result due to lack of space in the zoo the animals do not move freely in the circulation area and cannot live happily. As a symbol of this view, Ahmedabad National Park has an area of only 200 square meters for the lion family. The family only has to live in a restricted area, although the lion is known as the 'King of the Jungle'. Second, conditions at the zoo are often poor. Sometimes care is taken when treating organisms. Consequently, these behaviors by humans can impair the mental health of animals. It is helpful to shift to another school of Chintan Zoo to provide shelter to rare species of animals. First, all the basic facilities are provided to the endangered species. Thus, there are many doctors and caregivers available to keep these animals safe. For example, the USA government created a sanctuary for white rhinos. This authority has the land to put all the facilities for these rhinos. The purpose of this organization is to provide a conducive environment for these people. Second, the zoo protects rare animals from being hunted by other wild animals. As such, they spend the quality of their time fearlessly and happily. In conclusion, the zoo provides the best facilities to the animals but sometimes due to lack of care, it can also cause problems for the animals. In my opinion, in order to improve the quality of life of animals, both the government and the individuals should put their best foot together.
Animals
play an
important
role in the ecosystem. Society is in a dilemma
as to whether
zoos should
be banned
for being cruel to living creatures or whether they
help
save rare
animals
.
Different
people
have
different
mindsets.
However
, both have their
own
advantages and disadvantages. The
next
paragraph will clarify both approaches
before
commenting on my decision, starting with the
first
idea
that a zoo can
be closed
permanently
because
it is cruel, there are numerous things to share in its favor. The
first
and foremost is to lose the freedom of
animals
.
As a result
due to lack of space in the zoo the
animals
do not
move
freely
in the circulation area and cannot
live
happily
. As a symbol of this view, Ahmedabad National Park has an area of
only
200 square meters for the lion family. The family
only
has to
live
in a restricted area, although the lion
is known
as the 'King of the Jungle'. Second, conditions at the zoo are
often
poor.
Sometimes
care
is taken
when treating organisms.
Consequently
, these behaviors by humans can impair the mental health of
animals
. It is helpful to shift to another school of
Chintan
Zoo to provide shelter to rare species of
animals
.
First
, all the basic facilities
are provided
to the endangered species.
Thus
, there are
many
doctors and caregivers available to
keep
these
animals
safe.
For example
, the USA
government
created a sanctuary for white rhinos. This authority has the land to put all the facilities for these rhinos. The purpose of this organization is to provide a conducive environment for these
people
. Second, the zoo protects rare
animals
from
being hunted
by other wild
animals
. As such, they spend the quality of their time
fearlessly
and
happily
.
In conclusion
, the zoo provides the best facilities to the
animals
but
sometimes
due to lack of care, it can
also
cause problems for the
animals
. In my opinion, in order to
improve
the quality of life of
animals
, both the
government
and the individuals should put their best foot together.