Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people think the best way to solve global environmental issues is increasing the cost of fuels.

Some people think the best way to solve global environmental issues is increasing the cost of fuels. GWBMx

Some people believe that global environmental issues can be best solved by increasing fuels' prices. But, I strongly disagree with this opinion. It can be said that we can reduce the use of fossil fuels by increasing its costs. However, it can also have negative effects on our economy. Our technology is not well developed that much to replace all the fuels we are using everyday. In my opinion, there are still many other solutions we can do. The common cause of almost all environmental problems is industrilization. Industries emit many harmful gases into the air including greenhouse gases like carbondioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, etc. Greenhouse gases is the main culprit of global warming and sea level rising which can displace millions of people from their homes. These gases emitted from vehicles and factories originate air pollution and ozone depletion. So, to reduce burning fosssil fuels, we can use clean and renewable enegries such as water energy, wind energy, hydro energy and so forth. Nucleae energy isn't renewable but it has no harmful effect on environment. Governments should promote clean and renewable energy projects, replace fuel-fired cars with electric cars and encourage people to use public transport. There are some limitations to these projects. For example, we can't have enough energy from these clean energies till now. Nontheless, I believe it will not take no long to get through this obstacle. Another argument is to solve deforestation, plastic pollution and water pollution. Raising fuels' costs can't figure out these issues. We have to handle these in idividual, organisational, governmental and global scale. Governments must impose laws to reduce cutting down trees recklessly. People should reduce plastic use, reuse and recycle if we can. To conclude, increasing fuels' costs seems it can deal with industries and vehicles. But, it also has some drawbacks. And, there are still many things it can't get rid of like plastic pollution and deforestation. Accordingly, we have to cooperate in individual and collective level.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 believe that global environmental issues can be best solved by increasing fuels' prices. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
, I strongly
 disagree with this opinion. It can be said
 that we can You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
 the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of fossil fuels by increasing its costs. However
, it can also
 have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 effects on our economy. Our technology is not This word is normally spelled with hyphen.well-developed
well developed
 that much to replace all the fuels we are using 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean "every day"?every day
everyday
.

In my opinion, there are still
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 other solutions we can do. The common cause of almost all environmental problems is Possible spelling mistake found.industrialization
industrilization
. Industries emit This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 harmful You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gases
 into the air including greenhouse You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gases
 like Possible spelling mistake found.carbon dioxide
carbondioxide
, nitrous oxide, methane, etc. Greenhouse You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gases
 is the main culprit of global warming and sea level rising which can displace millions of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 from their homes. These You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gases
 emitted from vehicles and factories originate air You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 and ozone depletion. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
, to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
 burning Possible spelling mistake found.fossil
fosssil
 fuels, we can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 clean and renewable Possible spelling mistake found.energies
enegries
 such as water You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, wind You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, hydro You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 forth. Possible spelling mistake found.NuclearNucleateNuclease
Nucleae
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 isn't renewable This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it has no harmful effect on environment. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
Governments
 should promote clean and renewable You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 projects, replace fuel-fired cars with electric cars and encourage You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 public transport. There are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 limitations to these projects. For example
, we can't have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
enough
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 from these clean You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energies
 till This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
. Possible spelling mistake found.Nonetheless
Nontheless
, I believe it will Double negatives are discouraged in standard English. Can you reformulate this phrase or is a comma missing?
not take no
 long to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 through this obstacle. Another argument is to solve deforestation, plastic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 and water You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
. Raising fuels' costs can't figure out these issues. We This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 handle these in Possible spelling mistake found.individual
idividual
, Possible spelling mistake. 'organisational' is British English.organizational
organisational
, governmental and global scale. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
Governments
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 impose laws to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
 cutting down trees recklessly
. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
People
 should You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtrimlowercutdwindleshortenlessen
reduce
 plastic This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
, reuse and recycle if we can.

To conclude
, increasing fuels' costs seems it can deal with industries and vehicles. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
, it also
 has This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 drawbacks. And, there are still
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 things it can't This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 rid of like plastic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 and deforestation. Accordingly
, we This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 cooperate in individual and collective level. 