It is often said that preserving culture and progressing the travel industry cannot be done simultaneously because of conflict of interest. I completely disagree with this view and will give my reason below.
Firstly, tourism is one of the best possible ways to protect a huge number of traditional customs and ancient monuments that governments often cannot afford to preserve. Developing travel enables local people and authorities to get money from sightseers through selling attractions’ entrance tickets. For instance, Hoi An is an ancient town that has many hundreds-year-old houses. Solely relying on the source of public finance, Hoi An might fail to pay a large sum of money that is used for periodical restoring these old houses.
Secondly, when travel is becoming more commonplace, local people’s awareness of where they live is being raised. In fact, some native people would not have taken an interest in learning about the indigenous culture if tourism had not been developed. Although their initial purpose is monetizing from cultural traditions, it can bring many benefits in the long term as they are likely to protect their subsistence. Twenty years ago, Hoi An – where I was born and raised – was just a poor town and people did not have any notion of preserving the local historic heritage. However, the worldwide travel explosion impacts on every aspect of people there. Today, it is difficult to find anyone in Hoi An who does not have a deep knowledge of their living space.
In conclusion, I hold the view that conserving conventional culture should be put in parallel with expanding tourism. In the long run, this policy not only helps to develop the national economy but also aids in the preservation of valuable heritage.
It is
often
said that preserving culture and progressing the
travel
industry cannot
be done
simultaneously
because
of conflict of interest. I completely disagree with this view and will give my reason below.
Firstly
, tourism is one of the best possible ways to protect a huge number of traditional customs and ancient monuments that
governments
often
cannot afford to preserve. Developing
travel
enables local
people
and authorities to
get
money from sightseers through selling attractions’ entrance tickets.
For instance
,
Hoi
An is an ancient town that has
many
hundreds-year-
old
houses
.
Solely
relying on the source of public finance,
Hoi
An
might fail to pay a large sum of money
that is
used
for periodical restoring these
old
houses
.
Secondly
, when
travel
is becoming more commonplace, local
people’s
awareness of where they
live
is
being raised
. In fact,
some
native
people
would not have taken an interest in learning about the indigenous culture if tourism had not
been developed
. Although their initial purpose is monetizing from cultural traditions, it can bring
many
benefits in the long term as they are likely to protect their subsistence. Twenty years ago,
Hoi
An
–
where I
was born
and raised
–
was
just
a poor town and
people
did not have any notion of preserving the local historic heritage.
However
, the worldwide
travel
explosion impacts on every aspect of
people
there.
Today
, it is difficult to find anyone in
Hoi
An who does not have a deep knowledge of their living space.
In conclusion
, I hold the view that conserving conventional culture should
be put
in parallel with expanding tourism. In the long run, this policy not
only
helps
to develop the national economy
but
also
aids in the preservation of valuable heritage.