Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase tax on petrol. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Some people think that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase tax on petrol. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? dqbmp
The impacts of taxing on different kinds of gasoline on the growth of the economy are regarded as one of the crucial factors in many countries in the world. It is thought by some people that the amount of traffic and pollution can be decreased by having the government impose a higher tax on petrol. From my point of view, this should be properly examined from the different sides. A quick answer to limit the matter of traffic and pollution is believed to be an increase in tax on gasoline. This methodology creates a monetary burden on the users of vehicles forcing them to scale back the usage of gasoline. Consequently, it ends up in a big visit the traffic on roads thereby lowering the pollution levels. However, this methodology includes a variety of repercussions and it can not be used for an extended period. An increase in the tax on gas has various drawbacks despite the fact that it's fast thanks to lower pollution. Initially, folks might like better to scale back the employment of vehicles however shortly, they regulate their finances to accommodate the increase in tax. the top result is an identical quantity of traffic together with a money burden on voters. Another disadvantage would be the association with unhealthy relationships between the government and citizens. in addition, the quality of living is additionally affected as folks ought to compromise on alternative commodities to save lots of cash for fuel. On the other side, there are better ways to reduce traffic and pollution. One of them is to create awareness. The other is to improve the reliability of public transport. If people can take buses and trains and still reach their office on time, they are less likely to drive their own vehicles to work. In conclusion, the disadvantages related to a rise in the tax on petrol outweigh the advantages. Instead of forcibly trying to curb the traffic, the government can use alternatives like creating awareness among the people about the ill effects of pollution. Secondly, people can be provided other means of transport by enhancing the frequency and reliability of public transport. Lastly, the government can provide incentives for reducing the usage of vehicles.
The impacts of taxing on
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
kinds of gasoline on the growth of the economy
are regarded
as one of the crucial factors in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
countries in the world. It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
that the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
can
be decreased
by having the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
impose a higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
on petrol. From my point of view, this should be
properly
examined from the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
sides.

A quick answer to limit the matter of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
is believed
to be an increase in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
on gasoline. This methodology creates a monetary burden on the users of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
forcing them to scale back the usage of gasoline.
Consequently
, it ends up in a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
visit the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
on roads thereby lowering the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
levels.
However
, this methodology includes a variety of repercussions and it can not be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for an extended period.

An increase in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
on gas has various drawbacks despite the fact that it's
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
thanks to lower
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
Initially
, folks might like better to scale back the employment of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
however
shortly, they regulate their finances to accommodate the increase in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
the
top result is an identical quantity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
together with a money burden on voters. Another disadvantage would be the association with unhealthy relationships between the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
and citizens.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
in
addition, the quality of living is
additionally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
affected
as folks ought to compromise on alternative commodities to save lots of cash for fuel.

On the other side, there are better ways to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. One of them is to create awareness. The other is to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
the reliability of public transport. If
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can take buses and trains and
still
reach their office on time, they are less likely to drive their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
to work.

In conclusion
, the disadvantages related to a rise in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tax
on petrol outweigh the advantages.
Instead
of
forcibly
trying to curb the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
alternatives like creating awareness among the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
about the ill effects of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
.
Secondly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can
be provided
other means of transport by enhancing the frequency and reliability of public transport.
Lastly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can provide incentives for reducing the usage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase tax on petrol. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
369 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts