Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that the holders of vacine patents should allow others to use their inventions to fight the pandemic in emergency time. To what extend do you agree with this view?

Some people think that the holders of vacine patents should allow others to use their inventions to fight the pandemic in emergency time. lXeGQ
Recently, many people have thought that it is time to consider a patent reprieve for COVID-19 vaccines. In my opinion, I can understand why many people argue about it, and I think allowing to use of vaccine inventions freely is necessary for this emergency time. On the one hand, the waiver of vaccine patents could indeed have a role in accelerating the end of the pandemic. It can help to stop the spread of the virus COVID and prevent people from infection. Since the more people inject the vaccine, the more people will be safe. Moreover, the period of pandemics has had a severe impact on properties and people. The high- and upper-middle-income countries, which can place substantial advance orders with the relatively small group of companies making vaccines, could easily overcome the pandemic with their vaccine import and manufacture. But with the poorer nations, this period can prolong due to their underprivileged things. As a result, the pandemic can not be stopped completely if somewhere in the world still has it. On the other hand, the pharmaceutical industry, and some researchers argue that temporary relief from patents will not be necessary. Because these patents are a considerable effort in the long period, it is not easy to transfer to others countries. No one can ensure a developing country can build up enough facilities for this technology. In this instance, the patents are unuseful and harmful for both inventors and the poor countries. To sum up, there are times when competition helps research and innovation; there are also times when it needs to be set aside for the greater good. So the allowing use of vaccine inventions is reasonable and essential at this time.
Recently,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
that it is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
to consider a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
patent
reprieve for COVID-19
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vaccines
. In

my opinion, I can understand why
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
argue about it, and I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
allowing to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of vaccine

inventions
freely
is necessary for this emergency time.

On the one hand, the waiver of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vaccine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
patents
could
indeed
have a role in accelerating the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the

pandemic. It can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
the spread of the virus
Did you mean "COVID-19" or the alternative spelling "Covid-19" (= coronavirus)?
COVID
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from infection. Since the

more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
inject the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vaccine
, the more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will be safe.
Moreover
, the period of pandemics has had a

severe impact on properties and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. The high- and upper-middle-income countries, which can place

substantial advance orders with the
relatively
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
group of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
making
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vaccines
, could
easily


overcome the pandemic with their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vaccine
import and manufacture.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
with the poorer nations, this period

can prolong due to their underprivileged things.
As a result
, the pandemic can not be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stopped
completely if

somewhere in the world
still
has it.

On the other hand
, the pharmaceutical industry, and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
researchers argue that temporary relief from patents

will not be necessary.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Because
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
patents
are a considerable effort in the long period, it is not easy to

transfer to others countries. No one can ensure a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
developing country
can build up
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
facilities for this

technology. In this instance, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
patents
are unuseful and harmful for both inventors and the poor countries.

To sum up, there are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
times
when competition
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
research and innovation; there are
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
times
when it

needs to
be set
aside for the greater
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
the allowing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vaccine
inventions is reasonable and

essential at this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that the holders of vacine patents should allow others to use their inventions to fight the pandemic in emergency time.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
284 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people think that the holders of vacine patents should allow others to use their inventions to fight the pandemic in emergency time. To what extend do you agree with this view?