Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that the government should give money to creative people, such as artist and musician. To what extent do you agree?

There are a certain number of people who believe that the government should invest money in art, therefore, I disagree with this statement. I will come with details as follows; On the first hand, the government should have to make a balance between the arts and other parts. As it should classify things as per the importance. For example, science is the most important field that country should take care of. Creating methods by using the science field helps us to improve the environment of the country. It was mentioned that there are scientists, they have come with inventing devices which it can support to clear air pollution which it results from fossil fuel. Unfortunately, their ideas have not been supported to invent. However, the government must have set an eye for them because they can be counted as creative people as well. So keeping a proportion of money to be invested for them is a good idea. So it has to work to adopt their inventions for the future for getting a better situation and environment. Also, if it did not work on them to take them as an advantage, undoubtedly, their thoughts and ideas would be buried forever. As a consequence, there will be a reason for leaving the origin country. As a result, the country will lose them as well. However, the government should make a balance, not by giving attention only to art and ignoring other important sides. On the second hand, arts are also an essential area, so making another proportion of money investment to this domain, it would motivate artists and musicians to do something for the country, As they can be counted as talents people. Besides, the arts play an integral role in reflecting the image of the country. Therefore, it reflects about traditions of the country and its civilization. In brief, making a balance between both sides will assist the country from losing them in the future. As a result, they might be a useful asset. Notably, it should not take care of one part, and neglect another part.
There are a certain number of
people
who believe that the
government
should invest money in
art
,
therefore
, I disagree with this statement. I will
come
with
details
as follows;

On the
first
hand, the
government
should
have to
make
a balance between the
arts
and other parts. As it should classify things as per the importance.
For example
, science is the most
important
field that
country
should take care of. Creating methods by using the science field
helps
us to
improve
the environment of the
country
. It
was mentioned
that there are scientists, they have
come
with inventing devices which it can support to
clear
air pollution which it results from fossil fuel. Unfortunately, their
ideas
have not
been supported
to invent.
However
, the
government
must
have set an eye for them
because
they can
be counted
as creative
people
as well
.
So
keeping a proportion of money to
be invested
for them is a
good
idea
.
So
it
has to
work to adopt their inventions for the future for getting a better situation and environment.
Also
, if it did not work on them to take them as an advantage,
undoubtedly
, their thoughts and
ideas
would
be buried
forever. As a consequence, there will be a reason for leaving the origin
country
.
As a result
, the
country
will lose them
as well
.
However
, the
government
should
make
a balance, not by giving attention
only
to
art
and ignoring other
important
sides.

On the second hand,
arts
are
also
an essential area,
so
making another proportion of money investment to this domain, it would motivate artists and musicians to do something for the
country
, As they can
be counted
as talents
people
.
Besides
, the
arts
play an integral role in reflecting the image of the
country
.
Therefore
, it reflects about traditions of the
country
and its civilization.

In brief
, making a balance between both sides will assist the
country
from losing them in the future.
As a result
, they might be a useful asset.
Notably
, it should not take care of one part, and neglect another part.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that the government should give money to creative people, such as artist and musician.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
347 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts