Governments all over the world are grappling with problems like rising unemployment and growing threats of terrorism. Poverty is still a major issue in many countries in Asia, Latin America and Africa. In such a scenario, the argument that the government should stop wasting money on arts might sound logical. However, in my opinion, arts do have a place in the society. While I don’t think that the government should waste a lot of money on arts, it should at least adopt a benevolent attitude towards arts and artists.
Contrary to popular belief, arts are not a waste of time. In fact, they are also an industry with great potential to generate money. Performance arts, for instance, enjoy considerable following. A music concert or a dance show featuring an accomplished singer or dancer can create a lot of jobs. Arts can also help sell a country as a tourist destination. For example, the Indian government actively uses traditional arts forms to promote tourism in the country. India’s classical dance forms like Bharatanatyam and Kathakali have enthralled audience all over of the world and attract thousands of international tourists to the nation. The influx of tourists creates jobs and helps the local economy.
Paintings and sculptures also have huge commercial value. Millions of people visit museums in Spain, Italy and Holland to admire the works of masters like Vincent Van Gog, Picasso and Salvador Daly. While these artists are no longer around, their timeless works are still earning a lot of money for their countries. Nations that promote their ethic arts and crafts also tend to enjoy good reputation overseas.
To conclude, while it is true that spending money on imparting education and building infrastructure is more important than promoting arts, in my opinion, the government should still do whatever it can to promote and sustain arts. Art forms, especially those that have a huge following, benefit the national economy in many ways.
Governments
all over the world are grappling with problems like rising unemployment and growing threats of terrorism. Poverty is
still
a major issue in
many
countries
in Asia, Latin America and Africa. In such a scenario, the argument that the
government
should
stop
wasting
money
on
arts
might sound logical.
However
, in my opinion,
arts
do have a place in the society. While I don’t
think
that the
government
should waste
a lot of
money
on
arts
, it should at least adopt a benevolent attitude towards
arts
and artists.
Contrary to popular belief,
arts
are not a waste of time. In fact, they are
also
an industry with great potential to generate
money
. Performance
arts
,
for instance
, enjoy considerable following. A music concert or a dance
show
featuring an accomplished singer or dancer can create
a lot of
jobs.
Arts
can
also
help
sell a
country
as a tourist destination.
For example
, the Indian
government
actively
uses
traditional
arts
forms to promote tourism in the
country
. India’s classical dance forms like
Bharatanatyam
and
Kathakali
have enthralled audience all over of the world and attract thousands of international tourists to the nation. The influx of tourists creates jobs and
helps
the local economy.
Paintings and sculptures
also
have huge commercial value. Millions of
people
visit museums in Spain, Italy and Holland to admire the works of masters like Vincent Van Gog, Picasso and Salvador
Daly
. While these artists are no longer around, their timeless works are
still
earning
a lot of
money
for their
countries
. Nations that promote their ethic
arts
and crafts
also
tend to enjoy
good
reputation overseas.
To conclude
, while it is true that spending
money
on imparting education and building infrastructure is more
important
than promoting
arts
, in my opinion, the
government
should
still
do whatever it can to promote and sustain
arts
.
Art
forms,
especially
those that have a huge following, benefit the national economy in
many
ways.