According to some people, the government must invest in sectors other than arts as they consider it as a waste of money. I disagree with their thoughts as arts also contribute to the economy of the country and need financial assistance from the respective authority. This essay will elaborate on why the funds invested in the arts are also fruitful and how the governance's support will help the sector.
Firstly, art reflects the traditions and culture of a society or a nation. It is equally important to make sure that it is preserved and promoted all the time as it, in turn, keeps the traditions and culture alive. Also, many forms of art not only attract a lot of tourists, but also contribute to the economic development to some extent. So, the government should make every effort to encourage and support the artists, artisans, craftspersons financially whenever required. For instance, Bollywood which is famous for its art of film making, not only reflects the Indian society and its values, but also plays a major contribution to the economy of India. Thus, art forms when encouraged, definitely payback to the nation.
Moreover, many other arts such as handlooms, paintings, sculptures and so on, which are renowned across the globe for their unique style and intricate work, attract a lot of tourists. Unfortunately, many art forms are becoming extinct due to lack of boost in terms of money. Though the government is offering financial aid and encouragement to some of these, many still need recognition and promotional support. To cite an example, "Pichwai" paintings, though famous for their unique style as losing their prominence and many painters are facing difficulties selling their artworks to the enthusiasts. Thus, the government should make an effort to improve the present situation and preserve these art forms
To sum up, I disagree that the investments made by government on arts is useless as many art forms not only reflect the culture but also contribute to the economy.
According to
some
people
, the
government
must
invest in sectors other than
arts
as they consider it as a waste of money. I disagree with their thoughts as
arts
also
contribute to the economy of the country and need financial assistance from the respective authority. This essay will elaborate on why the funds invested in the
arts
are
also
fruitful and how the governance's support will
help
the sector.
Firstly
,
art
reflects the traditions and culture of a society or a nation. It is
equally
important
to
make
sure that it
is preserved
and promoted all the time as it, in turn,
keeps
the traditions and culture alive.
Also
,
many
forms
of
art
not
only
attract
a lot of
tourists,
but
also
contribute to the economic development to
some
extent.
So
, the
government
should
make
every effort to encourage and support the artists, artisans,
craftspersons
financially
whenever required.
For instance
, Bollywood which is
famous
for its
art
of film making, not
only
reflects the Indian society and its values,
but
also
plays a major contribution to the economy of India.
Thus
,
art
forms
when encouraged, definitely payback to the nation.
Moreover
,
many
other
arts
such as
handlooms
, paintings, sculptures and
so
on, which
are renowned
across the globe for their unique style and intricate work, attract
a lot of
tourists. Unfortunately,
many
art
forms
are becoming extinct due to lack of boost in terms of money. Though the
government
is offering financial aid and encouragement to
some
of these,
many
still
need recognition and promotional support. To cite an example,
"
Pichwai
"
paintings, though
famous
for their unique style as losing their prominence and
many
painters are facing difficulties selling their artworks to the enthusiasts.
Thus
, the
government
should
make
an effort to
improve
the present situation and preserve these
art
forms
To sum up, I disagree that the investments made by
government
on
arts
is useless as
many
art
forms
not
only
reflect the culture
but
also
contribute to the economy.