There is an opinion that children benefit more if they learn in the absence of study partners. Personally, I disagree with this view for each mode of learning offer unique benefits to school-goers and whether to study alone or with others depends on specific situations. On the one hand, studying in a group is indeed better than studying on one's own in some aspects. The key argument is that such method of learning expedites the learning process as group members can collectively cover more knowledge than any single individual ever could. In addition, discussion with others allows each person to get feedback on how well they perform, which is particularly important in skill-centric subjects like language where a big part of learning is identifying one's own mistakes and improving on them. Finally, having partners means we can be held accountable and keep ourselves motivated.
On the other hand, as useful as studying together 14, learning alone may actually be more fruitful in some cases. For example, if the level of the students in the same group is not uniform, individuals who are more advanced may find it unchallenging while novices could feel Intimidated. In this case, solitary learning is preferable, since each person can go at their own pace, choose the materials that match their level or work on specific areas. In addition, the logistics of group meetings may be time-consuming Members need to agree on a time and a place to meet, and working around their schedules is not always easy. In comparison, studying alone is more time efficient and allows for greater flexibility.
In conclusion, studying with others and studying by oneself benefit learners in their own ways, and they should opt for whichever method is more feasible and sults their needs best.
There is an opinion that children benefit more if they learn in the absence of study partners.
Personally
, I disagree with this view for each mode of
learning
offer unique benefits to school-goers and whether to study alone or with others depends on specific situations. On the one hand,
studying
in a
group
is
indeed
better than
studying
on one's
own
in
some
aspects. The key argument is that such method of
learning
expedites the
learning
process as
group
members can
collectively
cover more knowledge than any single individual ever could.
In addition
, discussion with others
allows
each person to
get
feedback on how well they perform, which is
particularly
important
in
skill
-centric subjects like language where a
big
part of
learning
is identifying one's
own
mistakes and improving on them.
Finally
, having partners means we can
be held
accountable and
keep
ourselves motivated.
On the
other
hand, as useful as
studying
together 14,
learning
alone may actually be more fruitful in
some
cases.
For example
, if the level of the students in the same
group
is not uniform, individuals who are more advanced may find it
unchallenging
while novices could feel Intimidated.
In this case
, solitary
learning
is preferable, since each person can go at their
own
pace, choose the materials that match their level or work on specific areas.
In addition
, the logistics of
group
meetings may be time-consuming Members need to
agree
on a time and a place to
meet
, and working around their schedules is not always easy.
In
comparison,
studying
alone is more time efficient and
allows
for greater flexibility.
In
conclusion,
studying
with others and
studying
by oneself benefit learners in their
own
ways, and they should opt for whichever method is more feasible and
sults
their needs best.