The importance of global media seems to increase every year, so much so to the point of introducing news channel into the classrooms. I believe this to be dangerous and potentially damaging due to the nature of the media.
Firstly, considering the importance of education in modern society, it is extremely worrisome and dangerous to consider substituting school subjects with international news. This is because there is no correct, balanced, unbiased news source. For example if a child spent their school days watching FOX NEWS, they would potentially have a skewed opinion of the world due to its unabashed right wing credentials. Therefore, changing a child’s information diet from traditional subject such as music or geography to watching a potentially partisan news channel is an extremely risky idea.
Secondly, if international news were to become a new subject it could have a detrimental emotional impact on young minds. In general the majority of news is negative, hence the expression ‘if it bleeds it leads’. For example, studies by the EFE News Agency show that 85% of headlines are negative in nature, usually referring to natural disasters, war, famine, etc. The logic of having these types of stories beamed into a school, to those of an impressionable age has to be challenged.
To conclude, due to the risk from political influences, and the harsh reality of global news, I am strongly in favour of maintaining the current curriculum.
The importance of global media seems to increase every year,
so
much
so
to the point of introducing
news
channel into the classrooms. I believe this to be
dangerous
and
potentially
damaging due to the nature of the media.
Firstly
, considering the importance of education in modern society, it is
extremely
worrisome and
dangerous
to consider substituting school subjects with international
news
. This is
because
there is no correct, balanced, unbiased
news
source.
For example
if a child spent their school days watching FOX
NEWS
, they would
potentially
have a skewed opinion of the world due to its unabashed right wing credentials.
Therefore
, changing a child’s information diet from traditional subject such as music or geography to watching a
potentially
partisan
news
channel is an
extremely
risky
idea
.
Secondly
, if international
news
were to become a
new
subject it could have a detrimental emotional impact on young minds.
In general
the majority of
news
is
negative
,
hence
the expression ‘if it bleeds it leads’.
For example
, studies by the
EFE
News
Agency
show
that 85% of headlines are
negative
in nature,
usually
referring to natural disasters, war, famine, etc. The logic of having these types of stories beamed into a school, to those of an impressionable age
has to
be challenged
.
To conclude
, due to the
risk
from political influences, and the harsh reality of global
news
, I am
strongly
in
favour
of maintaining the
current
curriculum.