Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

IT's known that in England and Australia access is denied for the jury to review any old criminal records when judging an accused suspect for possibly doing any acts that harm the society. This rule is for the sake of protection. Yet, it's also suggested by some lawyers that this should be cancelled and a full access to old criminal records should take place before making any decisions. This essay disagrees with the arguement because firstly, this will lead to a biased decision, and secondly, it will affect the ethical confidentiality. It has never been a great step to overpass confidential documents that relate to a defendant's past criminal record. This is because the jury will be possibely refering to unrelated data about the current case, and use them against the defendant. This act will discourage lawyers to take any further new cases because they will realize that all their efforts will not lead to their desired outcomes. For example, one of the regions in lebanon that allows access to old data, has 74% of decisions that accuse the defendants just because of their old criminal records. Moreover, Ethical confidentiality will be on stake. Any access to old data will lead to a mistrust of the judgement, and this will evoke the public opinions leading to violence in the streets because people will want a change in the judging system. For instance, In Saida city, upon a survey conducted recently, 82% of people do not trust the system and think that it is ethically corrupted and unfair. In conclusion, access to any old criminal data should not take place because this will lead to a biased judgement, and it will ruin any ethical confidentialty.
IT's known that in England and Australia
access
is denied
for the jury to review any
old
criminal
records when judging an accused suspect for
possibly
doing any acts that harm the society. This
rule
is for the sake of protection.
Yet
, it's
also
suggested by
some
lawyers that this should
be cancelled
and a full
access
to
old
criminal
records should take place
before
making any decisions. This essay disagrees with the
arguement
because
firstly
, this will
lead
to a biased decision, and
secondly
, it will affect the ethical confidentiality.

It has never been a great step to overpass confidential documents that relate to a defendant's past
criminal
record. This is
because
the jury will be
possibely
refering
to unrelated
data
about the
current
case, and
use
them against the defendant. This act will discourage lawyers to take any
further
new cases
because
they will realize that all their efforts will not
lead
to their desired outcomes.
For example
, one of the regions in
lebanon
that
allows
access
to
old
data
, has 74% of decisions that accuse the defendants
just
because
of their
old
criminal
records.

Moreover
, Ethical confidentiality will be on stake. Any
access
to
old
data
will
lead
to a mistrust of the judgement, and this will evoke the public opinions leading to violence in the streets
because
people
will want a
change
in the judging system.
For instance
, In
Saida
city, upon a survey conducted recently, 82% of
people
do not trust the system and
think
that it is
ethically
corrupted and unfair.

In conclusion
,
access
to any
old
criminal
data
should not take place
because
this will
lead
to a biased judgement, and it will ruin any ethical
confidentialty
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
284 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts