Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people think that resources should be spent on protecting wild animals, while others think those would be better used for the human population. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Some people think that resources should be spent on protecting wild animals, while others think those would be better used for the human population. Nrmlm

There are many who doubt the logic of spending money and time on wild animals when there are many humans are indeed. From my own perspective, the valid reasons to prioritize humanity may do not outweigh the fact that animals more desperately require refuge. Those who advocate for less aid for animals believe that human life is inherently much more valuable. In reality, humans are capable of higher reasoning skills, have more emotionally complex lives, and we share a primary obligation to members of our own society. A good example of this would be when it comes to covid-19 pandemic, people is apparently using their intelligence and professional skills to create vaccine to end up this illness. Furthermore, people are willing to contribute money or foods to some impoverished areas to support them overcome this hardest time. Increased funding for wildlife in effect means reduced resources allocated to charities for underprivileged people and the implicit elevation of animals over humans. Nonetheless, the risks to wild animals are pressing, and this would be seriously taken into consideration to action for helping them. Despite the glaring vulnerability of particular humans, nothing imperils humanity as a whole. This is not the case in terms of endangered animals such as lions, cheetahs, and polar bears. It is transparent that they are facing excessively with serious threats ranging the impact of climate change to deforestation and poaching. Those actions are all a direct consequence of human activities. Without our help, some rare species on the brink like blue whale would go extinct in the coming decades. This portends darker scenarios akin to the mass extinction in the ancient time when our efforts to bring them back would be becomingly useless. In conclusion, although the valuable of human is undeniable, the danger for at-risk animals is much greater than ever before. The longer we neglect animals, the greater the chance of extinction.

There are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 who doubt the logic of spending money and time on wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 when there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 are indeed
. From my This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 perspective, the valid reasons to prioritize humanity may do not outweigh the fact that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 more desperately
 require refuge.

Those who advocate for less aid for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 believe that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 life is inherently
 much more valuable. In reality, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 are capable of higher reasoning This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :proficiencies
skills
, have more emotionally
 complex This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
, and we share a primary obligation to members of our This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 society. A This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 example of this would be when it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approachesarrives
comes
 to Did you mean "COVID-19" or the alternative spelling "Covid-19" (= coronavirus)?COVID-19Covid-19
covid-19
 pandemic, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
If 'people' is plural here, don't use the third-person singular verb.amarearen
is
apparently
 using their intelligence and professional This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :proficiencies
skills
 to create vaccine to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 up this illness. Furthermore
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 are willing to contribute money or foods to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 impoverished areas to support them overcome this hardest time. Increased funding for wildlife in effect means This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviated
reduced
 resources allocated to charities for underprivileged This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 and the implicit elevation of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 over humans.

Nonetheless, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardsdangers
risks
 to wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are pressing, and this would be seriously
 taken into consideration to action for helping them. Despite the glaring vulnerability of particular You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
, nothing imperils humanity as a whole. This is not the case in terms of endangered You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 such as lions, cheetahs, and polar bears. It is transparent that they are facing excessively
 with serious threats ranging the impact of climate This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
 to deforestation and poaching. Those actions are all a direct consequence of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 activities. Without our This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 rare species on the brink like blue whale would go extinct in the coming decades. This portends darker scenarios akin to the mass extinction in the ancient time when our efforts to bring them back would be becomingly
 useless.

In conclusion
, although the valuable of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 is undeniable, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardrisk
danger
 for at-This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 is much greater than ever This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
. The longer we neglect You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
, the greater the chance of extinction. 